The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human–environment interactions at regional scales: the complex topography hypothesis applied to surface archaeological records in Australia and North America
Abstract
We match stone artefact distributions and assemblage compositions at the local geographical scale to measures of both complex topography and environmental history, as suggested by the work of B ailey and K ing. By comparing two study regions that have different topographic complexity measures, one in western N ew S outh W ales, A ustralia, and the other in O glala N ational G rassland, N orth A merican G reat P lains, we show that people created distinct long‐term landscape use histories in both regions. While stone artefact manufacture and use, and indeed the transport of stone artefacts over great distances, feature in both areas, the accumulation of stone artefacts in different places leads to a quite different site use history in each of the case study regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Graph trees are superior to absolute Euclidean distance measurements between two habitat zones because the weight of the entire network is considered as a functional whole.
“Graph trees are superior to absolute Euclidean distance measurements between two habitat zones because the weight of the entire network is considered as a functional whole (Dodge, Kitchin, & Perkins 2009; Holdaway et al. 2015; Laliberté & St-Laurent 2020; Wainwright et al. 2011).”
From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Holdaway et al. 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Allen H.A.1971.Where the Crow Flies Backwards: Man and Land in the Darling Basin. Unpublished PhD thesis Australian National University Canberra.
- Bailey G.N., 2005, Archaeology: The Key Concepts, 230
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.06.019 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00045361 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.01.004 · DOI
- Braun D.R.2006.The Ecology of Oldowan Technology: Perspectives from Koobi Fora and Kanjera South. Unpublished PhD Dissertation Rutgers University New Brunswick NJ.
- Charman P.E.V., 2000, Soils: Their Properties and Management
- 10.1016/j.jas.2006.01.003 · DOI
- 10.2307/40035313 · DOI
- Douglass M.J.2010.The Archaeological Potential of Informal Lithic Technologies. Unpublished PhD thesis University of Auckland Auckland.
- Douglass M.J., 2011, Changing Perspectives in Australian Archaeology, 45
- 10.1017/S0002731600046849 · DOI
- 10.1002/gea.20259 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1834-4453.1988.tb00186.x · DOI
- 10.2307/282203 · DOI
- Holdaway S.J., Use beyond manufacture: Non‐flint stone artifacts from Fowlers Gap, Australia, Lithic Technology
- Holdaway S.J., 2014, Geoarchaeology of Aboriginal Landscapes in Semiarid Australia, 10.1071/9780643108950 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2005.tb00584.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0959683607087930 · DOI
- Holdaway S.J., 2013, Archaeology in Environment and Technology: Intersections and Transformations, 51
- 10.1006/jasc.2002.0719 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001JB000393 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00093613 · DOI
- Kornfeld M., 2003, Islands on the Plains: Ecological, Social, and Ritual Use of Landscapes
- 10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.030 · DOI
- 10.1006/jaar.1997.0309 · DOI
- Meston L.K., 1976, Archaeological Investigations in the White River Region, Northwest Nebraska
- 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-1963(18)30837-1 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.105978 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00048985 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thomas, K. (2022) · Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology · doi:10.5334/jcaa.98 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Holdaway, S. J., King, G. C. P., Douglass, M. J., & Fanning, P. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland
- Institut de Physique du Globe Paris
- University of Nebraska‐Lincoln
- Macquarie University
- Venue
- Archaeology in Oceania
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 58-69
- ISSN
- 0728-4896
- 1834-4453
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Macquarie University
- University of Auckland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
