Reconstructing Palaeogeography and Inter‐island Visibility in the Wallacean Archipelago During the Likely Period of Sahul Colonization, 65–45 000 Years Ago
Open accessAbstract
The palaeogeography of the Wallacea Archipelago is a significant factor in understanding early modern human colonization of Sahul (Australia and New Guinea), and models of colonization patterns, as well as archaeological survey and site interpretation, are all heavily dependent on the specific palaeogeographic reconstruction employed. Here we present five reconstructions for the periods 65, 60, 55, 50, and 45 000 years ago, using the latest bathometric chart and a sea‐level model that is adjusted to account for the average uplift rate known from Wallacea. Using this data we also reconstructed island areal extent as well as topography for each time period. These reconstructions were then used to estimate visibility for each island in the archipelago, and finally to model how intervisible each island was during the period of likely human colonization. Our models provide the first evidence for intervisibility between Timor and Australia at ca. 65–62 ka and 47–12 ka, the second of which is notable for its overlap with the oldest radiocarbon dates from Timor‐Leste and Australia. Based on intervisibility alone, however, our study suggests that the northern route into Papua New Guinea was the most parsimonious route for first modern human entry into Sahul. Our study provides archaeologists with an important baseline from which to conduct physical surveys, interpret archaeological data, and theorize the colonization of Wallacea and Sahul. © 2017 The Authors. Archaeological Prospection Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first anatomically modern human populations to arrive in Island Southeast Asia most likely encountered a variety of hominin populations, no matter which route they took to enter Sahul.
“Nonetheless, the current fossil and archaeological records, together mounting genetic evidence from across ISEA, point to the widespread presence of archaic hominins east of Wallace's Line 26 , and indicate that the first AMH populations to arrive in ISEA most likely encountered a variety of hominin populations, no matter which route they took to enter Sahul 4752 .”
From Widespread Denisovan ancestry in Island Southeast Asia but no evidence of substantial super-archaic hominin admixture (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bird, M. I., Beaman, R. J., Condie, S. A., Cooper, A., Ulm, S., & Veth, P. (2018) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.04.027 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
Bird, M. I., Condie, S. A., O’Connor, S., O’Grady, D., Reepmeyer, C., Ulm, S., Zega, M., Saltré, F., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42946-9 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationTeixeira, J. C., Jacobs, G. S., Stringer, C., Tuke, J., Hudjashov, G., Purnomo, G. A., Sudoyo, H., Cox, M. P., Tobler, R., Turney, C. S. M., et al. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01408-0 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kealy, S., Louys, J., & O'Connor, S.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Archaeology and Natural History, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific Australian National University HC Coombs Building, 9 Fellows Rd Acton 2601 ACT Australia
- Corresponding author
- Kealy, Shimona
- Venue
- Archaeological Prospection
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-272
- ISSN
- 1075-2196 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0763
- OpenAlex
- W2588028722
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 50.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archaeological Prospection (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (Laureate FL120100156)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
- Keywords
- paleogeography, sea-level reconstruction, island uplift, Timor, early modern human dispersal, island topography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review