Cited by 32Archaeological Research and ProtectionHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

The aerial panopticon and the ethics of archaeological remote sensing in sacred cultural spaces

Open access
Davis, Dylan S., Buffa, Danielle, Rasolondrainy, Tanambelo, Creswell, Ebony, Anyanwu, Chiamaka, Ibirogba, Abiola, Randolph, Clare, Ouarghidi, Abderrahim +5 more·2021·Archaeological Prospection

Abstract

Remote sensing technology has become a standard tool for archaeological prospecting. Yet the ethical guidelines associated with the use of these technologies are not well established and are even less-often discussed in published literature. With a nearly unobstructed view of large geographic spaces, aerial and spaceborne remote sensing technology creates an asymmetrical power dynamic between observers and the observed. Here, we explore the power dynamics involved with aerial and spaceborne remote sensing, using Foucault's notion of power and the panopticon. In many other areas of archaeological practice, such power imbalances have been actively confronted by collaborative approaches and community engagement, but remote sensing archaeology has been largely absent from such interventions. We discuss how aerial and spaceborne imagery is perceived by local communities in southwest Madagascar and advocate for a more collaborative approach to remote sensing archaeology that includes local stakeholders and researchers in all levels of data acquisition, analysis, and dissemination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/arp.1819

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Amelot X., 2017, Dire l'océan Indien, 32
  2. Basso K. H., 1996, Senses of place, 53
  3. Benthem J., 1791, Panopticon or the inspection house
  4. Haggerty K., 2006, Theorising surveillance: The panopticon and beyond, 23
  5. Langley J. M., 2006, Vezo knowledge: Traditional ecological knowledge in Andavadoaka, southwest Madagascar
  6. Parcak S., 2019, Archaeology from space: How the future shapes our past
  7. Rosenthal A., 1968, Venture into space: Early years of Goddard Space Flight Center, 13
  8. Safi M., Ganges and Yamuna rivers granted same legal rights as human beings, The Guardian
  9. Thomas J., 1995, Landscape, politics and perspectives, 19

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, D. S., Buffa, D., Rasolondrainy, T., Creswell, E., Anyanwu, C., Ibirogba, A., Randolph, C., Ouarghidi, A., Phelps, L. N., Lahiniriko, F., Chrisostome, Z. M., Manahira, G., & Douglass, K.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB)
  • Morombe Archaeological Project Andavadoake Madagascar
Corresponding author
Davis, Dylan S.
Venue
Archaeological Prospection
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-20
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
305-320
ISSN
  • 1075-2196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0763
OpenAlex
W3157158353
Cited by
32
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archaeological Prospection (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
airborne remote sensing, satellite remote sensing, archaeological ethics, panopticon, Michel Foucault, power relations, community participation, collaborative archaeology, southwestern Madagascar

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review