Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,077

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: The Euro‐Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low‐dose versus high‐dose intravenous cyclophosphamide

Open access
Houssiau, Frédéric A., Vasconcelos, Carlos, D'Cruz, David, Sebastiani, Gian Domenico, Garrido, Enrique de Ramon, Danieli, Maria Giovanna, Abramovicz, Daniel, Blockmans, Daniel, Mathieu, Alessandro, Direskeneli, Haner, Galeazzi, Mauro, Gül, Ahmet, Levy, Yair, Petera, Peter, Popovic, Rajko, Petrovic, Radmila, Sinico, Renato Alberto, Cattaneo, Roberto, Font, Josep, Depresseux, Geneviève, Cosyns, Jean‐Pierre, Cervera, Ricard·2002·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Glomerulonephritis is a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that is usually treated with an extended course of intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (CYC). Given the side effects of this regimen, we evaluated the efficacy and the toxicity of a course of low‐dose IV CYC prescribed as a remission‐inducing treatment, followed by azathioprine (AZA) as a remission‐maintaining treatment. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective clinical trial (the Euro‐Lupus Nephritis Trial [ELNT]), we randomly assigned 90 SLE patients with proliferative glomerulonephritis to a high‐dose IV CYC regimen (6 monthly pulses and 2 quarterly pulses; doses increased according to the white blood cell count nadir) or a low‐dose IV CYC regimen (6 fortnightly pulses at a fixed dose of 500 mg), each of which was followed by AZA. Intent‐to‐treat analyses were performed. Results: Followup continued for a median of 41.3 months in the low‐dose group and 41 months in the high‐dose group. Sixteen percent of those in the low‐dose group and 20% of those in the high‐dose group experienced treatment failure (not statistically significant by Kaplan‐Meier analysis). Levels of serum creatinine, albumin, C3, 24‐hour urinary protein, and the disease activity scores significantly improved in both groups during the first year of followup. Renal remission was achieved in 71% of the low‐dose group and 54% of the high‐dose group (not statistically significant). Renal flares were noted in 27% of the low‐dose group and 29% of the high‐dose group. Although episodes of severe infection were more than twice as frequent in the high‐dose group, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The data from the ELNT indicate that in European SLE patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, a remission‐inducing regimen of low‐dose IV CYC (cumulative dose 3 gm) followed by AZA achieves clinical results comparable to those obtained with a high‐dose regimen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.10461

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,077

Metadata

Authors
Houssiau, F. A., Vasconcelos, C., D'Cruz, D., Sebastiani, G. D., Garrido, E. D. R., Danieli, M. G., Abramovicz, D., Blockmans, D., Mathieu, A., Direskeneli, H., Galeazzi, M., Gül, A., Levy, Y., Petera, P., Popovic, R., Petrovic, R., Sinico, R. A., Cattaneo, R., Font, J., Depresseux, G., Cosyns, J., & Cervera, R.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
2121-2131
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2096194879
Cited by
1,077
References
0
FWCI
16.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: The Euro‐Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low‐dose versus high‐dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10461
The paper
Houssiau, F. A., Vasconcelos, C., D'Cruz, D., Sebastiani, G. D., Garrido, E. D. R., Danieli, M. G., Abramovicz, D., Blockmans, D., Mathieu, A., Direskeneli, H., Galeazzi, M., Gül, A., Levy, Y., Petera, P., Popovic, R., Petrovic, R., Sinico, R. A., Cattaneo, R., Font, J., . . . Cervera, R. (2002). Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: The Euro‐Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low‐dose versus high‐dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10461

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.