Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 612

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Isolation and characterization of bone marrow multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells

Jones, Elena A., Kinsey, Sally E., English, Anne, Jones, Richard A., Straszynski, Liz, Meredith, David M., Markham, Alex F., Jack, Andrew, Emery, Paul, McGonagle, Dennis·2002·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: There is an increased interest in rheumatology in mesenchymal progenitor/stem cells (MPCs) and their roles in rheumatic diseases, but little is known about the phenotype of these cells in vivo. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize human bone marrow (BM) MPCs. Methods: Fluorescence microscopy was used to identify putative MPCs among adherent BM cells. To purify them, a positive selection with antifibroblast microbeads was used, combined with fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) for microbead+,CD45 low cells. A more detailed phenotype of these cells was determined using 4‐color flow cytometry, and standard chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic assays were used to investigate their differentiation potentials. Results: Putative MPCs microscopically identified as large, fibroblast‐like, D7‐FIB+ cells were purified using positive selection with D7‐FIB–conjugated (antifibroblast) microbeads followed by FACS for specifically bound microbead+,CD45 low cells. These cells represented 0.01% of mononuclear cells in the BM. They were uniformly positive for CD105, LNGFR, HLA–DR, CD10, CD13, CD90, STRO‐1, and bone morphogenetic protein receptor type IA (BMPRIA) and were negative for CD14, CD34, CD117, and CD133. Only cells with this phenotype could proliferate and produce adherent cell monolayers capable of chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. D7‐FIB− cells in the BM lacked any MPC activity. Uncultured skin fibroblasts had a phenotype similar to that of BM MPCs, but were negative for LNGFR, STRO‐1, HLA–DR, and BMPRIA. Conclusion: This study shows the distinct phenotype, morphology, and method of isolation of BM MPCs. The findings may have implications for defining the physiologic roles of MPCs in arthritis, bone diseases, and joint regeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.10696

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 612

Metadata

Authors
Jones, E. A., Kinsey, S. E., English, A., Jones, R. A., Straszynski, L., Meredith, D. M., Markham, A. F., Jack, A., Emery, P., & McGonagle, D.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
3349-3360
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2015856405
Cited by
612
References
1
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and characterization of bone marrow multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10696
The paper
Jones, E. A., Kinsey, S. E., English, A., Jones, R. A., Straszynski, L., Meredith, D. M., Markham, A. F., Jack, A., Emery, P., & McGonagle, D. (2002). Isolation and characterization of bone marrow multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10696

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.