Changes in self‐efficacy and health status over 5 years: A longitudinal observational study of 306 patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Abstract
Objective To investigate changes in self-efficacy and health status over 5 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the relationships between these changes, and the influence of baseline values on subsequent changes. Methods 306 adult patients with RA, born in 1926 or later, were examined by questionnaire in 1994 and again in 1999. We analyzed data regarding pain (visual analogue scale [VAS], Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale [AIMS2] symptom scale, Short Form-36 [SF-36] pain scale), fatigue (VAS, SF-36 vitality scale), mental distress (AIMS2 affect scale, SF-36 mental health scale) and self-efficacy (Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scales for pain and for other symptoms). Results On group level, all health status measures were numerically somewhat improved, and self-efficacy slightly reduced. Changes in self-efficacy and in corresponding health status measures were significantly correlated. For patients with above average educational level self-efficacy for pain at baseline was positively correlated to improvement in pain measures. Good mental health at baseline was correlated to improvement in self-efficacy for other symptoms, but only for patients with below average educational level. Conclusion Baseline self-efficacy seems to influence future level of perceived pain and baseline mental health status seems to influence future self-efficacy. These associations seem to be affected by level of education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients reporting higher levels of self-efficacy have lower levels of pain as well as lower levels of psychological distress and negative medical outcomes.
“patients reporting higher levels of self-efficacy have lower levels of pain as well as lower levels of psychological distress and negative medical outcomes.11,12,49,66,87”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [11]
Patients vary considerably in their self-efficacy.
“patients vary considerably in their self-efficacy”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self‐efficacy in people with arthritis
Lorig, K., Chastain, R. L., Ung, E., Shoor, S., & Holman, H. R. (1989) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/anr.1780320107 · Cited by 1,590 · see citing works
Callahan, L. F., Cordray, D. S., Wells, G., & Pincus, T. (1996) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1790090608 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies
Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.3200/jrlp.139.5.439-457 · Cited by 1,878 · see citing works
Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science
Keefe, F. J., Rumble, M. E., Scipio, C. D., Giordano, L. A., & Perri, L. M. (2004) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.576 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
The Role of Self-Efficacy on the Prognosis of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review
Martinez-Calderon, J., Zamora-Campos, C., Navarro-Ledesma, S., & Luque-Suarez, A. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.08.008 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Baron, M., Schieir, O., Hudson, M., Steele, R., Kolahi, S., Berkson, L., Couture, F., Fitzcharles, M. A., Gagné, M., Garfield, B., et al. (2008) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.23314 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
van Leeuwen, N. M., Boonstra, M., Huizinga, T. W. J., Kaptein, A. A., & de Vries‐Bouwstra, J. K. (2020) · Musculoskeletal Care · doi:10.1002/msc.1453 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brekke, M., Hjortdahl, P., & Kvien, T. K.
- Affiliations
- Diakonhjemmet Hospital (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 342-348
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0123
- OpenAlex
- W2045758938
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- rheumatoid arthritis, self-efficacy, health status, pain, fatigue, psychological distress, educational attainment, longitudinal change, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, SF-36, AIMS2
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Education, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review