Cited by 83Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Changes in self‐efficacy and health status over 5 years: A longitudinal observational study of 306 patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Brekke, Mette, Hjortdahl, Per, Kvien, Tore K.·2003·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective To investigate changes in self-efficacy and health status over 5 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the relationships between these changes, and the influence of baseline values on subsequent changes. Methods 306 adult patients with RA, born in 1926 or later, were examined by questionnaire in 1994 and again in 1999. We analyzed data regarding pain (visual analogue scale [VAS], Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale [AIMS2] symptom scale, Short Form-36 [SF-36] pain scale), fatigue (VAS, SF-36 vitality scale), mental distress (AIMS2 affect scale, SF-36 mental health scale) and self-efficacy (Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scales for pain and for other symptoms). Results On group level, all health status measures were numerically somewhat improved, and self-efficacy slightly reduced. Changes in self-efficacy and in corresponding health status measures were significantly correlated. For patients with above average educational level self-efficacy for pain at baseline was positively correlated to improvement in pain measures. Good mental health at baseline was correlated to improvement in self-efficacy for other symptoms, but only for patients with below average educational level. Conclusion Baseline self-efficacy seems to influence future level of perceived pain and baseline mental health status seems to influence future self-efficacy. These associations seem to be affected by level of education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.11112

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients reporting higher levels of self-efficacy have lower levels of pain as well as lower levels of psychological distress and negative medical outcomes.

    “patients reporting higher levels of self-efficacy have lower levels of pain as well as lower levels of psychological distress and negative medical outcomes.11,12,49,66,87”
  • Patients vary considerably in their self-efficacy.

    “patients vary considerably in their self-efficacy”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brekke, M., Hjortdahl, P., & Kvien, T. K.
Affiliations
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
342-348
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W2045758938
Cited by
83
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, self-efficacy, health status, pain, fatigue, psychological distress, educational attainment, longitudinal change, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, SF-36, AIMS2
MeSH terms
Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Education, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review