Cited by 1,878Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessHealth and Wellbeing Research

The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies

Luszczynska, Aleksandra, Scholz, Urte, Schwarzer, Ralf·2005·The Journal of Psychology

Abstract

General self-efficacy is the belief in one's competence to cope with a broad range of stressful or challenging demands, whereas specific self-efficacy is constrained to a particular task at hand. Relations between general self-efficacy and social cognitive variables (intention, implementation intentions, outcome expectancies, and self-regulation), behavior-specific self-efficacy, health behaviors, well-being, and coping strategies were examined among 1,933 respondents in 3 countries: Germany (n = 633), Poland (n = 359), and South Korea (n = 941). Participants were between 16 and 86 years old, and some were dealing with stressful situations such as recovery from myocardial events or tumor surgery. Perceived self-efficacy was measured by means of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (R. Schwarzer & M. Jerusalem, 1995). Meta-analysis was used to determine population effect sizes for four sets of variables. Across countries and samples, there is consistent evidence for associations between perceived self-efficacy and the variables under study confirming the validity of the psychometric scale. General self-efficacy appears to be a universal construct that yields meaningful relations with other psychological constructs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/jrlp.139.5.439-457

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ashby, J. S., & Kottman, T. (2000). The relationship between personality priorities and affect, depression, self-efficacy, and fear of intimacy. Journal of Individual Psychology, 56,172-183.
  2. Luszczynska, A. (in press). Wstepna adaptacja polskiej wersji narzedzia do oceny leku przed bólem Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III. [The preliminary adaptation of a Polish form of Fear of Pain Questionnaire-II]. Studia Psychologiczne.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R.
Affiliations
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
The Journal of Psychology
Published
2005-09
Volume
139
Issue
5
Pages
439-457
ISSN
  • 0022-3980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1019
OpenAlex
W2154060752
Cited by
1,878
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 134 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 178 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 53
FWCI
21.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
General Self-Efficacy Scale, general self-efficacy, scale validation, cross-cultural validation, implementation intentions, outcome expectations, self-regulation, health behavior, well-being, coping strategies, cancer surgery, psychometric properties
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Disease, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Ethnicity, Female, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Germany, Humans, Korea, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Poland, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Social Adjustment, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Health Behavior, Cultural Diversity, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review