The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis
Abstract
We evaluated methods of grading radiologic progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Sets of radiographs were assessed separately by 8 readers who were blinded to the time sequence. Included were radiographs of patients with OA of the hands (24 pairs), hips (40 pairs), and knees (32 pairs). Most films were taken 12–60 months apart. The relative contribution of individual joints (such as particular interphalangeal joints), of observations (such as narrowing or spurs), and of a single joint compartment (such as the medial or lateral compartment of the knee) toward evidence of OA progression was evaluated, as well as the reliability and concordance of scoring, and the sensitivity in detecting change. In assessing OA of the hand, the greatest sensitivity was achieved by reading a single posteroanterior bilateral hand radiograph for narrowing, spurs, and erosions, and scoring 10 joints (second and third distal interphalangeal, second and third proximal interphalangeal, and trapeziometacarpal joints, bilaterally), using a scale of 0–3. In OA of the hip, a single anteroposterior radiograph assessed for joint space narrowing and cyst formation yielded the greatest sensitivity. In OA of the knee, an anteroposterior radiograph, with weight‐bearing, assessed for narrowing, spurs, and sclerosis in both the medial and lateral compartments yielded the greatest sensitivity. These techniques will be useful to the investigator in designing experimental studies and to the clinician in determining the rate of disease progression in an individual patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised
Altman, R. D., & Gold, G. E. (2007) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009 · Cited by 1,372
Self-citationKIM, Y.-J., JARAMILLO, D., MILLIS, M. B., GRAY, M. L., & BURSTEIN, D. (2003) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200310000-00019 · Cited by 318
Sowers, M. F., Hayes, C., Jamadar, D., Capul, D., Lachance, L., Jannausch, M., & Welch, G. (2003) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00080-3 · Cited by 289
Long Distance Running and Knee Osteoarthritis
Chakravarty, E. F., Hubert, H. B., Lingala, V. B., Zatarain, E., & Fries, J. F. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.032 · Cited by 146
Self-citationDo optimism and pessimism predict physical functioning?
Brenes, G. A., Rapp, S. R., Rejeski, W. J., & Miller, M. E. (2002) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1015376510466 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Altman, R. D., Fries, J. F., Bloch, D. A., Carstens, J., Derek Mb, T. C., Genant, H., Gofton, P., Groth, H., Mcshane, D. J., Murphy, W. A., Sharp, J. T., Spitz, P., Williams, C. A., & Wolfe, F.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1214-1225
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W1988782889
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780301103
- The paper
- Altman, R. D., Fries, J. F., Bloch, D. A., Carstens, J., Derek Mb, T. C., Genant, H., Gofton, P., Groth, H., Mcshane, D. J., Murphy, W. A., Sharp, J. T., Spitz, P., Williams, C. A., & Wolfe, F. (1987). Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780301103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.