Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis

Altman, Roy D., Fries, James F., Bloch, Daniel A., Carstens, John, Derek Mb, T. Cooke, Genant, Harry, Gofton, Philip, Groth, Harry, Mcshane, Dennis J., Murphy, William A., Sharp, John T., Spitz, Patricia, Williams, Catherine A., Wolfe, Frederick·1987·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

We evaluated methods of grading radiologic progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Sets of radiographs were assessed separately by 8 readers who were blinded to the time sequence. Included were radiographs of patients with OA of the hands (24 pairs), hips (40 pairs), and knees (32 pairs). Most films were taken 12–60 months apart. The relative contribution of individual joints (such as particular interphalangeal joints), of observations (such as narrowing or spurs), and of a single joint compartment (such as the medial or lateral compartment of the knee) toward evidence of OA progression was evaluated, as well as the reliability and concordance of scoring, and the sensitivity in detecting change. In assessing OA of the hand, the greatest sensitivity was achieved by reading a single posteroanterior bilateral hand radiograph for narrowing, spurs, and erosions, and scoring 10 joints (second and third distal interphalangeal, second and third proximal interphalangeal, and trapeziometacarpal joints, bilaterally), using a scale of 0–3. In OA of the hip, a single anteroposterior radiograph assessed for joint space narrowing and cyst formation yielded the greatest sensitivity. In OA of the knee, an anteroposterior radiograph, with weight‐bearing, assessed for narrowing, spurs, and sclerosis in both the medial and lateral compartments yielded the greatest sensitivity. These techniques will be useful to the investigator in designing experimental studies and to the clinician in determining the rate of disease progression in an individual patient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780301103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Altman, R. D., Fries, J. F., Bloch, D. A., Carstens, J., Derek Mb, T. C., Genant, H., Gofton, P., Groth, H., Mcshane, D. J., Murphy, W. A., Sharp, J. T., Spitz, P., Williams, C. A., & Wolfe, F.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-11
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
1214-1225
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W1988782889
Cited by
372
References
0
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780301103
The paper
Altman, R. D., Fries, J. F., Bloch, D. A., Carstens, J., Derek Mb, T. C., Genant, H., Gofton, P., Groth, H., Mcshane, D. J., Murphy, W. A., Sharp, J. T., Spitz, P., Williams, C. A., & Wolfe, F. (1987). Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780301103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.