Cited by 92Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingAging and Gerontology ResearchHealth and Wellbeing Research

Do optimism and pessimism predict physical functioning?

Brenes, Gretchen A., Rapp, Stephen R., Rejeski, W. Jack, Miller, Michael E.·2002·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Dispositional optimism has been shown to be related to self-report measures of health and well-being, yet little research has examined the relationship between optimism and more objective measures of functioning. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between optimism and pessimism and objective physical functioning. Four hundred eighty community-dwelling older adults with knee pain completed a measure of optimism and pessimism and were observed performing four daily activities (walking, lifting an object, climbing stairs, and getting into and out of a car). Results indicated that pessimism was significantly related to performance on all four tasks (p < .001), while optimism was related to performance only on the walking task (p < .05), after controlling for demographic and health variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015376510466

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prospective studies suggest that pre-morbid psychological dysfunction is a risk factor for later development of many chronic pain conditions, including musculoskeletal pain and functional pain disorders.

    “prospective studies suggest that pre-morbid psychological dysfunction represents a risk factor for the future development of numerous chronic pain conditions including musculoskeletal pain and functional pain disorders 14, 36–39.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brenes, G. A., Rapp, S. R., Rejeski, W. J., & Miller, M. E.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Brenes, Gretchen A.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2002-06
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
219-231
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W131751579
Cited by
92
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wake Forest University
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ar042388-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (T32-AG00182, P60AG010484, T32AG000182, P60 AG-10484)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01-AR-42388)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR-00211, M01RR000211)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
dispositional optimism, pessimism, physical function, older adults, knee pain, activities of daily living, functional performance, walking, stair climbing, community-dwelling
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Osteoarthritis, Personality Assessment, Physical Fitness, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review