Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predictors of survival in systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma)

Altman, Roy D., Medsger, Thomas A., Bloch, Daniel A., Michel, Beat A.·1991·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

We conducted followup of 264 patients with definite systemic sclerosis (SSc) who were entered into the multicenter Scleroderma Criteria Cooperative Study (SCCS) during 1973–1977. At the end of the study (average 5.2 years of followup), 38% were known to be alive, 50% were dead (68% of these deaths definitely related to SSc), and 12% were lost to followup. Survival analyses of 484 demographic, clinical, and laboratory items recorded at entry into the SCCS (within 2 years of physician diagnosis of SSc) were performed. Survival declined linearly, and the cumulative survival rate was <80% at 2 years, 50% at 8.5 years, and 30% at 12 years after entry. Analysis using combinations of entry variables identifying organ system involvement confirmed that renal, cardiac, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal involvement in SSc predicted reduced survival; however, data on organ system involvement at study entry could not be used to consistently predict which organ system would ultimately be involved as the primary cause of death. By survival tree analysis, the individual entry variables best predicting reduced survival included older age (>64 years), reduced renal function (blood urea nitrogen >16 mg/dl), anemia (hemoglobin ≤11 gm/dl), reduced pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (≤50% of predicted), reduced total serum protein level (≤6 gm/dl), and reduced pulmonary reserve (forced vital capacity <80% with hemoglobin >14 gm/dl or forced vital capacity <65% with hemoglobin ≤14 gm/dl). Cox proportional hazards model analysis confirmed these results. Different combinations of variables led to markedly different survival rates. The poorest prospects for survival were in patients with SSc who were ≤64 years old with a hemoglobin level ≤11 gm/dl, and in those >64 years old with a blood urea nitrogen level >16 mg/dl. These results may be useful in predicting individual patients at risk for shortened survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780340405

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Altman, R. D., Medsger, T. A., Bloch, D. A., & Michel, B. A.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
403-413
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2132986338
Cited by
298
References
0
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of survival in systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780340405
The paper
Altman, R. D., Medsger, T. A., Bloch, D. A., & Michel, B. A. (1991). Predictors of survival in systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma). Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780340405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.