The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predictors of survival in systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma)
Abstract
We conducted followup of 264 patients with definite systemic sclerosis (SSc) who were entered into the multicenter Scleroderma Criteria Cooperative Study (SCCS) during 1973–1977. At the end of the study (average 5.2 years of followup), 38% were known to be alive, 50% were dead (68% of these deaths definitely related to SSc), and 12% were lost to followup. Survival analyses of 484 demographic, clinical, and laboratory items recorded at entry into the SCCS (within 2 years of physician diagnosis of SSc) were performed. Survival declined linearly, and the cumulative survival rate was <80% at 2 years, 50% at 8.5 years, and 30% at 12 years after entry. Analysis using combinations of entry variables identifying organ system involvement confirmed that renal, cardiac, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal involvement in SSc predicted reduced survival; however, data on organ system involvement at study entry could not be used to consistently predict which organ system would ultimately be involved as the primary cause of death. By survival tree analysis, the individual entry variables best predicting reduced survival included older age (>64 years), reduced renal function (blood urea nitrogen >16 mg/dl), anemia (hemoglobin ≤11 gm/dl), reduced pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (≤50% of predicted), reduced total serum protein level (≤6 gm/dl), and reduced pulmonary reserve (forced vital capacity <80% with hemoglobin >14 gm/dl or forced vital capacity <65% with hemoglobin ≤14 gm/dl). Cox proportional hazards model analysis confirmed these results. Different combinations of variables led to markedly different survival rates. The poorest prospects for survival were in patients with SSc who were ≤64 years old with a hemoglobin level ≤11 gm/dl, and in those >64 years old with a blood urea nitrogen level >16 mg/dl. These results may be useful in predicting individual patients at risk for shortened survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972–2002
Steen, V. D., & Medsger, T. A. (2007) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2006.066068 · Cited by 1,528
Self-citationTyndall, A. J., Bannert, B., Vonk, M., Airò, P., Cozzi, F., Carreira, P. E., Bancel, D. F., Allanore, Y., Müller-Ladner, U., Distler, O., et al. (2010) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2009.114264 · Cited by 1,443
Mayes, M. D., Lacey, J. V., Beebe‐Dimmer, J., Gillespie, B. W., Cooper, B., Laing, T. J., & Schottenfeld, D. (2003) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.11073 · Cited by 935
Mortality in systemic sclerosis: An international meta-analysis of individual patient data
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Vlachoyiannopoulos, P. G., Haidich, A.-B., Medsger, T. A., Lucas, M., Michet, C. J., Kuwana, M., Yasuoka, H., van den Hoogen, F., te Boome, L., et al. (2005) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.04.031 · Cited by 438
Self-citationVAN DEN HOOGEN, F. H. J., BOERBOOMS, A. M. T., SWAAK, A. J. G., RASKER, J. J., VAN LIER, H. J. J., & VAN DE PUTTE, L. B. A. (1996) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/35.4.364 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Altman, R. D., Medsger, T. A., Bloch, D. A., & Michel, B. A.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-413
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2132986338
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of survival in systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780340405
- The paper
- Altman, R. D., Medsger, T. A., Bloch, D. A., & Michel, B. A. (1991). Predictors of survival in systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma). Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780340405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.