Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 935

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence, incidence, survival, and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis in a large US population

Mayes, Maureen D., Lacey, James V., Beebe‐Dimmer, Jennifer, Gillespie, Brenda W., Cooper, Brenda, Laing, Timothy J., Schottenfeld, David·2003·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence, incidence, survival, and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the Detroit tricounty area. Methods: A census of SSc cases for the period 1989–1991 was conducted in the Detroit area, using multiple sources for case identification. Diagnoses were verified by medical record review. Capture‐recapture analysis was used to estimate the total SSc population. Cases of localized scleroderma (morphea and linear disease) were excluded. Results: Based on 706 verified cases of SSc, prevalence was initially estimated to be 242.0 cases per million adults (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 213–274), with an annual incidence of 19.3 new cases per million adults per year (95% CI 12.4–30.2). Capture‐recapture analysis, based on the degree of overlap of verified cases among multiple sources, resulted in a revised prevalence estimate of 276 cases per million adults (95% CI 245–310). Sex‐ and race‐specific prevalence estimates were significantly higher for women than for men, and for blacks than for whites. The average age at diagnosis was significantly younger for blacks than for whites. Compared with white patients, black patients were almost twice as likely to have diffuse disease (prevalence proportion ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.48–2.35). Median survival was ∼11 years. Factors negatively affecting survival included male sex (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.29–2.55) and older age at diagnosis (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.05). Conclusion: This study establishes baseline estimates of SSc occurrence and characteristics in a large US cohort consisting primarily of black adults and white adults. These data should facilitate research regarding the role of geographic, ethnic, racial, and environmental factors for this disease in comparison populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.11073

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 935

Metadata

Authors
Mayes, M. D., Lacey, J. V., Beebe‐Dimmer, J., Gillespie, B. W., Cooper, B., Laing, T. J., & Schottenfeld, D.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
2246-2255
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2168198817
Cited by
935
References
29
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence, incidence, survival, and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis in a large US population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.11073
The paper
Mayes, M. D., Lacey, J. V., Beebe‐Dimmer, J., Gillespie, B. W., Cooper, B., Laing, T. J., & Schottenfeld, D. (2003). Prevalence, incidence, survival, and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis in a large US population. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11073

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.