The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group Preliminary Criteria for the Classification of Spondylarthropathy
Abstract
Classification criteria for most of the disorders belonging to the spondylarthropathy group already exist. However, the spectrum of spondylarthropathy is wider than the sum of these disorders suggests. Sero‐negative oligoarthritis, dactylitis or polyarthritis of the lower extremities, heel pain due to enthesitis, and other undifferentiated cases of spondylarthropathy have been ignored in epidemiologic studies because of the inadequacy of existing criteria. In order to define classification criteria that also encompass patients with undifferentiated spondylarthropathy, we studied 403 patients with all forms of spondylarthropathy and 674 control patients with other rheumatic diseases. The diagnoses were based on the local clinical expert's opinion. The 403 patients included 168 with ankylosing spondylitis, 68 with psoriatic arthritis, 41 with reactive arthritis, 17 with inflammatory bowel disease and arthritis, and 109 with unclassified spondylarthropathy. Based on statiscal analysis and clinical reasoning, we propose the following classification criteria for spondylarthropathy inflammatory spinal pain or synovitis (asymmetric or predominantly in the lower limbs), together with at least 1 of the following: positive family history, psoriasis inflammatory bowel disease, urethritis, or acute diarrhea, alternating buttock pain, enthesopathy, or sacroiliitis as determined from radiography of the pelvic region. These criteria resulted in a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 87%. The proposed classification criteria are easy to apply in clinical practice and performed well in all 7 participating centers. However, we regard them as preliminary until they have been further evaluated in other settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rudwaleit, M., van der Heijde, D., Landewé, R., Akkoc, N., Brandt, J., Chou, C. T., Dougados, M., Huang, F., Gu, J., Kirazli, Y., et al. (2011) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2010.133645 · Cited by 1,768
Self-citationDistinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria?
Aggarwal, R., Ringold, S., Khanna, D., Neogi, T., Johnson, S. R., Miller, A., Brunner, H. I., Ogawa, R., Felson, D., Ogdie, A., et al. (2015) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.22583 · Cited by 539
Development and validation of the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST)
Perrot, S., Bouhassira, D., & Fermanian, J. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.03.034 · Cited by 236
Crotti, T. N., Smith, M. D., Weedon, H., Ahern, M. J., Findlay, D. M., Kraan, M., Tak, P. P., & Haynes, D. R. (2002) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.61.12.1047 · Cited by 186
Haynes, D. R. (2003) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg047 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Dougados, M., Linden, S. V. D., Juhlin, R., Huitfeldt, B., Amor, B., Calin, A., Cats, A., Dijkmans, B., Olivieri, I., Pasero, G., Veys, E., & Zeidler, H.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-10-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1218-1227
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2037976962
- Cited by
- 2,299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group Preliminary Criteria for the Classification of Spondylarthropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780341003
- The paper
- Dougados, M., Linden, S. V. D., Juhlin, R., Huitfeldt, B., Amor, B., Calin, A., Cats, A., Dijkmans, B., Olivieri, I., Pasero, G., Veys, E., & Zeidler, H. (1991). The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group Preliminary Criteria for the Classification of Spondylarthropathy. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780341003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.