The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Isolated diffusing capacity reduction in systemic sclerosis
Abstract
Objective. To determine the long‐term outcome of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and an isolated reduction in the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) at the time of initial evaluation. Methods. Patients with an isolated reduction in DLco (i.e., normal forced vital capacity [FVC] and normal ratio of the forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV 1] to the FVC) on initial evaluation were identified from among 815 patients with SSc who were carefully followed up throughout their illness. We requested that patients have repeat pulmonary function testing (PFT), and the outcomes of these tests, as well as cardiopulmonary and survival outcomes, were determined. Results. An isolated reduction in DLco, with a normal FVC was detected in 152 (19%) of the 815 patients. A subset of those with an isolated reduction in DLco (11%) developed isolated pulmonary hypertension and had severely reduced survival rates. Pulmonary hypertension was strongly associated with an initial DLco of < 55% of predicted normal and a FVC (% predicted)/DLco (% predicted) ratio of > 1.4. Among all patients in whom this ratio was > 1.4, 22% developed isolated pulmonary hypertension, compared with only 2% of those whose ratio was <1.4 (P < 0.01). Of the 152 patients with isolated DLco reduction, 73 (48%) underwent PFTs a mean of 5.4 years (range 2.0–13.2) after the initial PFT. Only 6 (8%) of these 73 patients ever had serious pulmonary disease: 5 had isolated pulmonary hypertension, and 1 had severe pulmonary fibrosis. Half of the patients with a low initial DLco demonstrated a significant improvement (>20%) at followup testing that could not be explained by the demographic, clinical, or laboratory findings at the first visit. Conclusion. Isolated reduction in DLco is a frequent abnormality in SSc. Overall, it is associated with a good prognosis for survival and for pulmonary morbidity. A small subset of patients (11%) who have a very low DLco (<55% of predicted) have developed isolated pulmonary hypertension, all of whom had limited scleroderma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Screening, Early Detection, and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
McGoon, M., Gutterman, D., Steen, V., Barst, R., McCrory, D. C., Fortin, T. A., & Loyd, J. E. (2004) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.126.1_suppl.14s · Cited by 932
Self-citationVolkmann, E. R., Andréasson, K., & Smith, V. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01692-0 · Cited by 616
Severe restrictive lung disease in systemic sclerosis
Steen, V. D., Conte, C., Owens, G. R., & Medsger, T. A. (1994) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780370903 · Cited by 526
Self-citationSolomon, J. J., Olson, A. L., Fischer, A., Bull, T., Brown, K. K., & Raghu, G. (2013) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/09059180.00005512 · Cited by 294
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Hoeper, M. M., Madani, M. M., Nakanishi, N., Meyer, B., Cebotari, S., & Rubin, L. J. (2014) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70089-x · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Steen, V. D., Graham, G., Conte, C., Owens, G., & Medsger, T. A.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 765-770
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2126904414
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolated diffusing capacity reduction in systemic sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780350709
- The paper
- Steen, V. D., Graham, G., Conte, C., Owens, G., & Medsger, T. A. (1992). Isolated diffusing capacity reduction in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780350709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.