Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 526

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Severe restrictive lung disease in systemic sclerosis

Steen, Virginia D., Conte, Claudia, Owens, Gregory R., Medsger, Thomas A.·1994·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective. We sought to identify risk factors for developing severe restrictive lung disease and to determine the time of onset and rate of progression in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods. Using the University of Pittsburgh Scleroderma Databank, we grouped patients according to their lowest forced vital capacity (FVC) value: <75% predicted, 50—75% predicted, and > 50% predicted. In patients with severe restrictive disease, we examined serial pulmonary function test (PFT) results to determine the rate of loss of lung volume over time. Results. Of 890 SSc patients, 60% (n = 531) never had an FVC ⩽75% predicted; 27% (n = 243) had moderate restrictive disease, with an FVC value of 50—75% predicted; and only 13% (n = 116) of the patients had severe restrictive disease, with FVC ⩽50% predicted. Black race, male sex, early disease, and primary cardiac involvement due to SSc were the features most frequently associated with severe restrictive lung disease (by multiple logistic regression). Fifty–five patients with severe restrictive lung disease had their first of at least 2 PFTs during the first 5 years after onset of any SSc (not pulmonary) symptoms. In 30 patients, the FVC declined by 32% per year in the first 2 years of illness, in 16 patients the annual loss was 12% in years 2—4 after disease onset, and in 9 patients annual loss was 3% during years 4—6 of disease (P < 0.005 by 1–way analysis of variance). Conclusion. In SSc patients, black men with early disease who have cardiac involvement are the most likely to have factors associated with the development of severe restrictive lung disease (which is increasingly becoming a major cause of death). Disease subtype (diffuse versus limited cutaneous) and serum antitopoisomerase I antibody do not differentiate between moderate and severe restrictive disease. Careful monitoring of pulmonary function early in the disease, when the greatest loss of lung function occurs, may help identify patients likely to respond to new therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780370903

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 526

Metadata

Authors
Steen, V. D., Conte, C., Owens, G. R., & Medsger, T. A.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-08
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
1283-1289
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2042113729
Cited by
526
References
14
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe restrictive lung disease in systemic sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780370903
The paper
Steen, V. D., Conte, C., Owens, G. R., & Medsger, T. A. (1994). Severe restrictive lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780370903

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.