The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus race and gender differences
Abstract
Objective. To examine racial differences in the incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. A population‐based registry of SLE patients in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, was used to identify incident cases of SLE diagnosed between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1990, from 3 sources, by medical record review (University of Pittsburgh Lupus Databank, rheumatologists, and hospitals). Capture‐recapture methods using log‐linear models were used to estimate the level of case‐finding and to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI). Incidence rates were calculated per 100,000 population. Results. A total of 191 definite and 78 probable incident cases of SLE were identified, and the overall annual incidence rates were 2.4 (95% CI 2.1–2.8) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.8–1.3), respectively. The crude incidence rates of definite SLE were 0.4 for white males, 3.5 for white females, 0.7 for African‐American males, and 9.2 for African‐American females. The annual incidence rates of definite SLE remained fairly constant over the study interval. African‐American females with definite SLE had a younger mean age at diagnosis compared with white females (P < 0.05). Since the overall ascertainment rate was high (85%; 95% CI 78–92%), the ascertainment‐corrected incidence rate for definite SLE, 2.8 (95% CI 2.6–3.2), was similar to the crude rate. Conclusion. Our rates clearly confirm previous reports of an excess incidence of SLE among females compared with males and among African‐Americans compared with whites. We have used capture–recapture methods to improve the accuracy of SLE incidence rates, and we advocate their use to facilitate comparisons across studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kirschbaum, C., Kudielka, B. M., Gaab, J., Schommer, N. C., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1999) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199903000-00006 · Cited by 1,890
Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: a review
Kudielka, B. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2005) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.11.009 · Cited by 1,624
Modulatory Effects of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 on Human B Cell Differentiation
Chen, S., Sims, G. P., Chen, X. X., Gu, Y. Y., Chen, S., & Lipsky, P. E. (2007) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1634 · Cited by 1,119
Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of worldwide disease burden
Danchenko, N., Satia, J. A., & Anthony, M. S. (2006) · Lupus · doi:10.1191/0961203306lu2305xx · Cited by 834
Rees, F., Doherty, M., Grainge, M. J., Lanyon, P., & Zhang, W. (2017) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex260 · Cited by 789
Metadata
- Authors
- Mccarty, D. J., Manzi, S., Medsger, T. A., Ramsey‐Goldman, R., Laporte, R. E., & Kwoh, C. K.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1260-1270
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2010444612
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus race and gender differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780380914
- The paper
- Mccarty, D. J., Manzi, S., Medsger, T. A., Ramsey‐Goldman, R., Laporte, R. E., & Kwoh, C. K. (1995). Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus race and gender differences. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.