Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 426

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus race and gender differences

Mccarty, Daniel J., Manzi, Susan, Medsger, Thomas A., Ramsey‐Goldman, Rosalind, Laporte, Ronald E., Kwoh, C. Kent·1995·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective. To examine racial differences in the incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. A population‐based registry of SLE patients in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, was used to identify incident cases of SLE diagnosed between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1990, from 3 sources, by medical record review (University of Pittsburgh Lupus Databank, rheumatologists, and hospitals). Capture‐recapture methods using log‐linear models were used to estimate the level of case‐finding and to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI). Incidence rates were calculated per 100,000 population. Results. A total of 191 definite and 78 probable incident cases of SLE were identified, and the overall annual incidence rates were 2.4 (95% CI 2.1–2.8) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.8–1.3), respectively. The crude incidence rates of definite SLE were 0.4 for white males, 3.5 for white females, 0.7 for African‐American males, and 9.2 for African‐American females. The annual incidence rates of definite SLE remained fairly constant over the study interval. African‐American females with definite SLE had a younger mean age at diagnosis compared with white females (P < 0.05). Since the overall ascertainment rate was high (85%; 95% CI 78–92%), the ascertainment‐corrected incidence rate for definite SLE, 2.8 (95% CI 2.6–3.2), was similar to the crude rate. Conclusion. Our rates clearly confirm previous reports of an excess incidence of SLE among females compared with males and among African‐Americans compared with whites. We have used capture–recapture methods to improve the accuracy of SLE incidence rates, and we advocate their use to facilitate comparisons across studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780380914

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 426

Metadata

Authors
Mccarty, D. J., Manzi, S., Medsger, T. A., Ramsey‐Goldman, R., Laporte, R. E., & Kwoh, C. K.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
1260-1270
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2010444612
Cited by
426
References
0
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus race and gender differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780380914
The paper
Mccarty, D. J., Manzi, S., Medsger, T. A., Ramsey‐Goldman, R., Laporte, R. E., & Kwoh, C. K. (1995). Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus race and gender differences. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380914

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.