Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,582

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The development and initial validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics/American college of rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus

Open access
Gladman, Dafna, Ginzler, Ellen, Goldsmith, Charles, Fortin, Paul, Liang, Matthew, Sanchez‐Guerrero, Jorge, Urowitz, Murray, Bacon, Paul, Bombardieri, Stefano, Hanly, John, Jones, John, Hay, Elaine, Symmons, Deborah, Isenberg, David, Kalunion, Kenneth, Maddison, Peter, Nived, Ola, Sturfelt, Gunnar, Petri, Michelle, Richter, Martin, Snaith, Michael, Zoma, Asad·1996·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective. To develop and perform an initial validation of a damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. A list of items considered to reflect damage in SLE was generated through a nominal group process. A consensus as to which items to be included in an index was reached, together with rules for ascertainment. Each center submitted 2 assessments, 5 years apart, on 2 patients with active and 2 with inactive disease, of whom 1 had increased damage and the other had stable disease. Analysis of variance was used to test the factors physician, time, amount of damage, and activity status. Results. Nineteen physicians completed the damage index on 42 case scenarios. The analysis revealed that the damage index could identify changes in damage seen in patients with both active and inactive disease. Patients who had active disease at both time points had a higher increase in damage. There was good agreement among the physicians on the assessment of damage in these patients. Conclusion. This damage index for SLE records damage occurring in patients with SLE regardless of its cause. The index was demonstrated to have content, face, criterion, and discriminant validity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780390303

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,582

Metadata

Authors
Gladman, D., Ginzler, E., Goldsmith, C., Fortin, P., Liang, M., Sanchez‐Guerrero, J., Urowitz, M., Bacon, P., Bombardieri, S., Hanly, J., Jones, J., Hay, E., Symmons, D., Isenberg, D., Kalunion, K., Maddison, P., Nived, O., Sturfelt, G., Petri, M., Richter, M., Snaith, M., & Zoma, A.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
363-369
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2108905161
Cited by
2,582
References
0
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development and initial validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics/American college of rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780390303
The paper
Gladman, D., Ginzler, E., Goldsmith, C., Fortin, P., Liang, M., Sanchez‐Guerrero, J., Urowitz, M., Bacon, P., Bombardieri, S., Hanly, J., Jones, J., Hay, E., Symmons, D., Isenberg, D., Kalunion, K., Maddison, P., Nived, O., Sturfelt, G., Petri, M., . . . Zoma, A. (1996). The development and initial validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics/American college of rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780390303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.