The relationships of cognitive coping and pain control beliefs to pain and adjustment among African-American and Caucasian women with rheumatoid arthritis
Abstract
Objective.Ethnic groups may experience or report pain differently; thus, we compared ethnic differences on pain coping strategies and control beliefs, and the relationships of these variables to health status, among women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods.Using a sample of 100 women (48 African‐American, 52 Caucasian), we related pain coping strategies and control beliefs to pain severity, activity levels, and affective state, controlling for socioeconomics, behavioral impairment, and disease activity. Results.Ethnic groups did not differ in pain severity or negative affect, but African‐Americans were less physically active. African‐Americans used more coping techniques involving diverting attention and praying/hoping; Caucasians used more coping techniques involving ignoring pain. The relationships of praying/hoping and reinterpreting pain to RA adjustment differed by ethnic group. In contrast, ignoring pain, coping statements, and stronger control beliefs predicted better health status, and diverting attention predicted more pain for all patients. Conclusion.There are ethnic differences in the use of coping strategies that should be acknowledged when helping RA patients cope with their disease, but control beliefs and several coping strategies predict pain and adjustment, regardless of ethnicity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Migraine and temporomandibular disorders have similar prevalence in prepubescent males and females, with differences emerging after puberty.
“studies demonstrating similar prevalence across prepubescent males and females for conditions such as migraine and temporomandibular disorders with differences in prevalence emerging after puberty 149, 182–184.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [183]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 148
- Authors
- Jordan, M. S., Lumley, M. A., & Leisen, C. C.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lumley, Mark A.
- ORCID
- Lumley, Mark A.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-88
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2152332409
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Arthritis & Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- rheumatoid arthritis, pain coping, ethnic differences, African American women, white women, health status, pain intensity, physical activity, negative affect
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Black or African American, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Health Status, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Pain, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review