Cited by 148Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The relationships of cognitive coping and pain control beliefs to pain and adjustment among African-American and Caucasian women with rheumatoid arthritis

Jordan, Margaret S., Lumley, Mark A., Leisen, C. C.·1998·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective.Ethnic groups may experience or report pain differently; thus, we compared ethnic differences on pain coping strategies and control beliefs, and the relationships of these variables to health status, among women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods.Using a sample of 100 women (48 African‐American, 52 Caucasian), we related pain coping strategies and control beliefs to pain severity, activity levels, and affective state, controlling for socioeconomics, behavioral impairment, and disease activity. Results.Ethnic groups did not differ in pain severity or negative affect, but African‐Americans were less physically active. African‐Americans used more coping techniques involving diverting attention and praying/hoping; Caucasians used more coping techniques involving ignoring pain. The relationships of praying/hoping and reinterpreting pain to RA adjustment differed by ethnic group. In contrast, ignoring pain, coping statements, and stronger control beliefs predicted better health status, and diverting attention predicted more pain for all patients. Conclusion.There are ethnic differences in the use of coping strategies that should be acknowledged when helping RA patients cope with their disease, but control beliefs and several coping strategies predict pain and adjustment, regardless of ethnicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1790110203

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Migraine and temporomandibular disorders have similar prevalence in prepubescent males and females, with differences emerging after puberty.

    “studies demonstrating similar prevalence across prepubescent males and females for conditions such as migraine and temporomandibular disorders with differences in prevalence emerging after puberty 149, 182–184.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 148

Authors
Jordan, M. S., Lumley, M. A., & Leisen, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
Lumley, Mark A.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
80-88
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2152332409
Cited by
148
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis & Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, pain coping, ethnic differences, African American women, white women, health status, pain intensity, physical activity, negative affect
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Black or African American, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Health Status, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Pain, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review