Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 639

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides predict progression to rheumatoid arthritis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis: A prospective cohort study

Open access
van Gaalen, F. A., Linn‐Rasker, S. P., van Venrooij, W. J., de Jong, B. A., Breedveld, F. C., Verweij, C. L., Toes, R. E. M., Huizinga, T. W. J.·2004·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common, severe, chronic inflammatory joint disease. Since the disease may initially be indistinguishable from other forms of arthritis, early diagnosis can be difficult. Autoantibodies seen in RA can be detected years before clinical symptoms develop. In an inception cohort of patients with recent‐onset arthritis, we undertook this study to assess the predictive value of RA‐specific autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCPs) in patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA). Methods: Anti‐CCP2 antibody tests were performed at baseline in 936 consecutive, newly referred patients with recent‐onset arthritis. Patients who could not be properly classified 2 weeks after inclusion were categorized as having UA. Patients with UA were followed up for 3 years and evaluated for progression of their disease to RA as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 revised criteria. Results: Three hundred eighteen of 936 patients with recent‐onset arthritis were classified as having UA and were available for analysis. After 3 years of followup, 127 of 318 UA patients (40%) had been classified as having RA. RA had developed in 63 of 249 patients (25%) with a negative anti‐CCP test and in 64 of 69 patients (93%) with a positive anti‐CCP test (odds ratio 37.8 [95% confidence interval 13.8–111.9]). Multivariate analysis of the presence of anti‐CCP antibodies and parameters from the ACR criteria identified polyarthritis, symmetric arthritis, erosions on radiographs, and anti‐CCP antibodies as significant predictors of RA. Conclusion: Testing for anti‐CCP antibodies in UA allows accurate prediction of a substantial number of patients who will fulfill the ACR criteria for RA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.20044

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 639

Metadata

Authors
van Gaalen, F. A., Linn‐Rasker, S. P., van Venrooij, W. J., de Jong, B. A., Breedveld, F. C., Verweij, C. L., Toes, R. E. M., & Huizinga, T. W. J.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
709-715
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2117220283
Cited by
639
References
20
FWCI
33.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides predict progression to rheumatoid arthritis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis: A prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.20044
The paper
van Gaalen, F. A., Linn‐Rasker, S. P., van Venrooij, W. J., de Jong, B. A., Breedveld, F. C., Verweij, C. L., Toes, R. E. M., & Huizinga, T. W. J. (2004). Autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides predict progression to rheumatoid arthritis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis: A prospective cohort study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20044

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.