The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: A prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis
Abstract
Objective: To develop a clinical model for the prediction, at the first visit, of 3 forms of arthritis outcome: self‐limiting, persistent nonerosive, and persistent erosive arthritis. Methods: A standardized diagnostic evaluation was performed on 524 consecutive, newly referred patients with early arthritis. Potentially diagnostic determinants obtained at the first visit from the patient's history, physical examination, and blood and imaging testing were entered in a logistic regression analysis. Arthritis outcome was recorded at 2 years' followup. The discriminative ability of the model was expressed as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). Results: The developed prediction model consisted of 7 variables: symptom duration at first visit, morning stiffness for ≥1 hour, arthritis in ≥3 joints, bilateral compression pain in the metatarsophalangeal joints, rheumatoid factor positivity, anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity, and the presence of erosions (hands/feet). Application of the model to an individual patient resulted in 3 clinically relevant predictive values: one for self‐limiting arthritis, one for persistent nonerosive arthritis, and one for persistent erosive arthritis. The ROC AUC of the model was 0.84 (SE 0.02) for discrimination between self‐limiting and persistent arthritis, and 0.91 (SE 0.02) for discrimination between persistent nonerosive and persistent erosive arthritis, whereas the discriminative ability of the American College of Rheumatology 1987 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis was significantly lower, with ROC AUC values of 0.78 (SE 0.02) and 0.79 (SE 0.03), respectively. Conclusion: A clinical prediction model was developed with an excellent ability to discriminate, at the first visit, between 3 forms of arthritis outcome. Validation in other early arthritis clinics is necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards
Valenstein, P. N. (1990) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/93.2.252 · Cited by 220
Cited by
The Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
McInnes, I. B., & Schett, G. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1004965 · Cited by 5,514
Bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment
Schett, G., & Gravallese, E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2012.153 · Cited by 947
Vossenaar, E. R., Radstake, T. R. D., van der Heijden, A., van Mansum, M. A. M., Dieteren, C., de Rooij, D.-J., Barrera, P., Zendman, A. J. W., & van Venrooij, W. J. (2004) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2003.012211 · Cited by 455
Zhong, Q., Xiao, X., Qiu, Y., Xu, Z., Chen, C., Chong, B., Zhao, X., Hai, S., Li, S., An, Z., et al. (2023) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.261 · Cited by 442
Clinical utility of the anti-CCP assay in patients with rheumatic diseases
Lee, D. M., & Schur, P. H. (2003) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.62.9.870 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Visser, H., le Cessie, S., Vos, K., Breedveld, F. C., & Hazes, J. M. W.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 357-365
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2043343045
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: A prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10117
- The paper
- Visser, H., le Cessie, S., Vos, K., Breedveld, F. C., & Hazes, J. M. W. (2002). How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: A prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.