Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 731

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: A prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis

Visser, Henk, le Cessie, Saskia, Vos, Koen, Breedveld, Ferdinand C., Hazes, Johanna M. W.·2002·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To develop a clinical model for the prediction, at the first visit, of 3 forms of arthritis outcome: self‐limiting, persistent nonerosive, and persistent erosive arthritis. Methods: A standardized diagnostic evaluation was performed on 524 consecutive, newly referred patients with early arthritis. Potentially diagnostic determinants obtained at the first visit from the patient's history, physical examination, and blood and imaging testing were entered in a logistic regression analysis. Arthritis outcome was recorded at 2 years' followup. The discriminative ability of the model was expressed as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). Results: The developed prediction model consisted of 7 variables: symptom duration at first visit, morning stiffness for ≥1 hour, arthritis in ≥3 joints, bilateral compression pain in the metatarsophalangeal joints, rheumatoid factor positivity, anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity, and the presence of erosions (hands/feet). Application of the model to an individual patient resulted in 3 clinically relevant predictive values: one for self‐limiting arthritis, one for persistent nonerosive arthritis, and one for persistent erosive arthritis. The ROC AUC of the model was 0.84 (SE 0.02) for discrimination between self‐limiting and persistent arthritis, and 0.91 (SE 0.02) for discrimination between persistent nonerosive and persistent erosive arthritis, whereas the discriminative ability of the American College of Rheumatology 1987 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis was significantly lower, with ROC AUC values of 0.78 (SE 0.02) and 0.79 (SE 0.03), respectively. Conclusion: A clinical prediction model was developed with an excellent ability to discriminate, at the first visit, between 3 forms of arthritis outcome. Validation in other early arthritis clinics is necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.10117

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 731

Metadata

Authors
Visser, H., le Cessie, S., Vos, K., Breedveld, F. C., & Hazes, J. M. W.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
357-365
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2043343045
Cited by
731
References
1
FWCI
29.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: A prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10117
The paper
Visser, H., le Cessie, S., Vos, K., Breedveld, F. C., & Hazes, J. M. W. (2002). How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: A prediction model for persistent (erosive) arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.