Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low‐dose aspirin and prevention of cranial ischemic complications in giant cell arteritis

Nesher, Gideon, Berkun, Yaakov, Mates, Michal, Baras, Mario, Rubinow, Alan, Sonnenblick, Moshe·2004·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Cranial ischemic complications such as cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) and acute visual loss are among the leading causes of giant cell arteritis (GCA)–related morbidity. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effect of treatment with low‐dose aspirin on the incidence of cranial ischemic complications in GCA. Methods: Charts of 175 consecutive patients in whom GCA was diagnosed between 1980 and 2000 were reviewed for medical data. Data for 166 patients who were followed up for at least 3 months were also available. Results: At the time of the diagnosis of GCA, 36 patients (21%) had already been receiving low‐dose aspirin (100 mg/day). In all cases, the indication for this treatment was ischemic heart disease. There were no significant differences between the aspirin‐treated and non–aspirin‐treated groups regarding the mean age of patients, the male‐to‐female ratio, duration of GCA‐related symptoms, rates of headaches, systemic symptoms, and jaw claudication, and the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hemoglobin count, and platelet count. Cerebrovascular risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes mellitus) were more common in the aspirin‐treated group (38.9% versus 20%;P= 0.03). Cranial ischemic complications were diagnosed in 43 patients at presentation: 30 patients had acute visual loss, 11 had CVAs, and 2 had both conditions simultaneously. Only 3 of the aspirin‐treated patients (8%) presented with cranial ischemic complications, compared with 40 (29%) of the non–aspirin‐treated patients (P= 0.01). Despite the use of steroid therapy, cranial ischemic complications developed in 14 of the 166 patients followed up for 3 months or longer. However, cranial ischemic complications developed in only 3% of the aspirin‐treated patients, compared with 13% of the patients treated with prednisone only (P= 0.02). Conclusion: These data suggest that low‐dose aspirin decreases the rate of visual loss and CVAs in patients with GCA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.20171

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Nesher, G., Berkun, Y., Mates, M., Baras, M., Rubinow, A., & Sonnenblick, M.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
1332-1337
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W1991581462
Cited by
429
References
2
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low‐dose aspirin and prevention of cranial ischemic complications in giant cell arteritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.20171
The paper
Nesher, G., Berkun, Y., Mates, M., Baras, M., Rubinow, A., & Sonnenblick, M. (2004). Low‐dose aspirin and prevention of cranial ischemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.