The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty‐year period
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To investigate time trends in the incidence and survival of giant cell arteritis (GCA) over a 50‐year period in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Methods: Using the unified record system at the Mayo Clinic, we identified all incident cases of GCA first diagnosed between 1950 and 1999. Incidence rates were estimated and adjusted to the 1980 United States white population for age and sex. The annual incidence rates were graphically illustrated using a 3‐year centered moving average. Survival rates were computed and compared with the expected rates in the population. Results: There were 173 incident cases of GCA during the 50‐year study period. Of these, 79% were women and the mean age at diagnosis was 74.8 years. The overall age‐ and sex‐adjusted incidence per 100,000 persons 50 years of age or older was 18.8 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 15.9–21.6). Incidence was higher in women (24.4; 95% CI 20.3–28.6) than in men (10.3; 95% CI 6.9–13.6). Incidence rates increased significantly over the study period (P = 0.017); in particular, a progressive increase was observed from 1950 to 1979; subsequently, no substantial increases in incidence rates were observed. A cyclic pattern of annual incidence rates was apparent, with evidence of 6 peak periods. Survival among individuals with GCA was not significantly different from that expected in the population (P = 0.80). Conclusions: The incidence of GCA increased over the first 3 decades of the study, then remained stable over the last 20 years. The previously observed cyclic pattern of annual incidence rates was still apparent over a 50‐year period. Overall survival in GCA was similar to that in the population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis
Salvarani, C., Cantini, F., & Hunder, G. G. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61077-6 · Cited by 767
Self-citationPolymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis
Ettlinger, R. E., Hunder, G. G., & Ward, L. E. (1978) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.me.29.020178.000311 · Cited by 687
Self-citationSmeeth, L., Cook, C., & Hall, A. J. (2006) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2005.046912 · Cited by 299
Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment
Borchers, A. T., & Gershwin, M. E. (2012) · Autoimmunity Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003 · Cited by 256
What is known about the epidemiology of the vasculitides?
Watts, R. A., Lane, S., & Scott, D. G. I. (2005) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2004.11.006 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Salvarani, C., Crowson, C. S., O'Fallon, W. M., Hunder, G. G., & Gabriel, S. E.
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 264-268
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0123
- OpenAlex
- W1554717495
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty‐year period. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.20227
- The paper
- Salvarani, C., Crowson, C. S., O'Fallon, W. M., Hunder, G. G., & Gabriel, S. E. (2004). Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty‐year period. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.