Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of a functional single‐nucleotide polymorphism of PTPN22, encoding lymphoid protein phosphatase, with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus

Orozco, Gisela, Sánchez, Elena, González‐Gay, Miguel A., López‐Nevot, Miguel A., Torres, Belén, Cáliz, Rafael, Ortego‐Centeno, Norberto, Jiménez‐Alonso, Juan, Pascual‐Salcedo, Dora, Balsa, Alejandro, de Pablo, Rosario, Nuñez‐Roldan, Antonio, González‐Escribano, Ma Francisca, Martín, Javier·2005·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To assess the possible association between the PTPN22 gene 1858C→T polymorphism and the predisposition and clinical expression of 2 systemic autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Our study population consisted of 826 RA patients, 338 SLE patients, and 1,036 healthy subjects. All subjects were of Spanish Caucasian origin. Genotyping of the PTPN22 gene 1858C→T polymorphism was performed by real‐time polymerase chain reaction technology, using the TaqMan 5′‐allele discrimination assay. Results: The overall distribution of genotypes in the RA patients was significantly different from that in the controls (P = 0.005, by chi‐square test with 2 × 3 contingency tables). We observed a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the PTPN22 1858T allele between healthy subjects (7.4%), and RA patients (10.4%) (P = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 1.45 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15–1.83]). In addition, PTPN22 1858 C/T and T/T genotypes were present at a significantly higher frequency in SLE patients than in controls (P = 0.02, OR 1.55 [95% CI 1.05–2.29]). Differences were also observed when allele frequencies were compared, with the PTPN22 1858T allele being present at a higher frequency among SLE patients (P = 0.03, OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.01–2.09]). Conclusion: These results suggest that the PTPN22 1858T allele may confer differential susceptibility to RA and SLE in the Spanish population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.20771

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Orozco, G., Sánchez, E., González‐Gay, M. A., López‐Nevot, M. A., Torres, B., Cáliz, R., Ortego‐Centeno, N., Jiménez‐Alonso, J., Pascual‐Salcedo, D., Balsa, A., de Pablo, R., Nuñez‐Roldan, A., González‐Escribano, M. F., & Martín, J.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
219-224
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2163735374
Cited by
314
References
2
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.