Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 860

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (ASSERT)

van der Heijde, Désirée, Dijkmans, Ben, Geusens, Piet, Sieper, Joachim, DeWoody, Kimberly, Williamson, Paul, Braun, Jürgen·2005·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: The signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) respond inadequately to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs in quite a number of patients. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have demonstrated success in reducing AS disease activity in a limited number of clinical trials. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with AS. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive infusions of placebo or 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, and 18. Efficacy was assessed using the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), night pain, patient's global assessment, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), chest expansion, the Mander enthesis index, the total swollen joint index, the C‐reactive protein level, and the Short Form 36 (SF‐36) health survey questionnaire. The primary end point in this study was the proportion of patients with a 20% improvement response according to the ASAS International Working Group criteria (ASAS20 responders) at week 24. Results: Of the 357 patients screened, 201 were assigned to receive 5 mg/kg infliximab and 78 were assigned to receive placebo. After 24 weeks, 61.2% of patients in the infliximab group were ASAS20 responders compared with 19.2% of patients in the placebo group ( P < 0.001). Clinical benefit was observed in patients receiving infliximab as early as week 2 and was maintained over the 24‐week study period. Patients receiving infliximab also showed significant improvements in the BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, chest expansion, and physical component summary score of the SF‐36. Adverse events were reported by 82.2% of patients receiving infliximab and by 72.0% of patients receiving placebo; however, most adverse events in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity. Conclusion: Infliximab was well tolerated and effective in a large cohort of patients with AS during a 24‐week study period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.20852

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 860

Metadata

Authors
van der Heijde, D., Dijkmans, B., Geusens, P., Sieper, J., DeWoody, K., Williamson, P., & Braun, J.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
582-591
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2081388746
Cited by
860
References
1
FWCI
36.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (ASSERT). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.20852
The paper
van der Heijde, D., Dijkmans, B., Geusens, P., Sieper, J., DeWoody, K., Williamson, P., & Braun, J. (2005). Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (ASSERT). Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20852

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.