Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 872

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

van der Heijde, Désirée, Kivitz, Alan, Schiff, Michael H., Sieper, Joachim, Dijkmans, Ben A. C., Braun, Jürgen, Dougados, Maxime, Reveille, John D., Wong, Robert L., Kupper, Hartmut, Davis, John C.·2006·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab, a fully human recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets human tumor necrosis factor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized (2:1 ratio), double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to evaluate a subcutaneous injection of adalimumab, 40 mg every other week, compared with placebo for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a 20% response according to the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group criteria for improvement (ASAS20) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included the ASAS20 at week 24 and multiple measures of disease activity, spinal mobility, and function, as well as ASAS partial remission. Results: At week 12, 58.2% of adalimumab‐treated patients (121 of 208) achieved an ASAS20 response, compared with 20.6% of placebo‐treated patients (22 of 107) ( P < 0.001). More patients in the adalimumab group (45.2% [94 of 208]) than in the placebo group (15.9% [17 of 107]) had at least a 50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index at week 12 ( P < 0.001). Significant improvements in the ASAS40 response and the response according to the ASAS5/6 criteria at weeks 12 and 24 were also demonstrated ( P < 0.001). Partial remission was achieved by more adalimumab‐treated patients than placebo‐treated patients (22.1% versus 5.6%; P < 0.001). Adalimumab‐treated patients reported more adverse events (75.0% versus 59.8% of placebo‐treated patients; P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infections. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Conclusion: Adalimumab was well‐tolerated during the 24‐week study period and was associated with a significant and sustained reduction in the signs and symptoms of active AS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.21913

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 872

Metadata

Authors
van der Heijde, D., Kivitz, A., Schiff, M. H., Sieper, J., Dijkmans, B. A. C., Braun, J., Dougados, M., Reveille, J. D., Wong, R. L., Kupper, H., & Davis, J. C.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-27
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
2136-2146
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W1990305566
Cited by
872
References
0
FWCI
33.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.21913
The paper
van der Heijde, D., Kivitz, A., Schiff, M. H., Sieper, J., Dijkmans, B. A. C., Braun, J., Dougados, M., Reveille, J. D., Wong, R. L., Kupper, H., & Davis, J. C. (2006). Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21913

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.