Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

High‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of hand osteoarthritis

Tan, Ai Lyn, Grainger, Andrew J., Tanner, Steven F., Shelley, David M., Pease, Colin, Emery, Paul, McGonagle, Dennis·2005·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the use of a novel surface coil for clinically utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, in order to describe the microanatomic basis for hand osteoarthritis (OA) at all stages of disease. Methods: MRI of proximal or distal interphalangeal joints was performed in 58 subjects: 16 patients with early OA (symptom duration ≤12 months), 14 patients with chronic OA, 10 patients with clinically normal asymptomatic joints adjacent to arthritic joints, and 18 normal controls. High‐resolution images were obtained with displayed pixel dimensions of 80–100 μm using a 1.5T scanner and a 23‐mm–diameter surface coil. All joint structures were evaluated. Results: The high‐resolution images of every joint structure showed comparable abnormalities in both early and chronic OA, including cartilage loss, bone edema, synovial enhancement, osteophytosis, and erosions. Heberden's and Bouchard's node formation occurred at regions where soft tissue bulged through the capsule between the dorsal tendons and collateral ligaments (CLs). Prominent CL thickening or disruption (100% of OA patients) was evident even in joints where cartilage was partially preserved. Clinically normal joints adjacent to OA hand joints showed thickening and enhancement of CLs which was the most common abnormality seen (80% of OA patients). Older normal subjects showed subtle changes within the CLs. Conclusion: Obtaining high‐resolution MR images from clinically utilized scanners represents a novel way for exploring the microanatomic basis of hand arthritis and may have considerable potential in the clinical setting. In the present evaluation in nodal OA, previously unappreciated CL abnormalities were especially common.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.21210

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Tan, A. L., Grainger, A. J., Tanner, S. F., Shelley, D. M., Pease, C., Emery, P., & McGonagle, D.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-28
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
2355-2365
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2014934138
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of hand osteoarthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.21210
The paper
Tan, A. L., Grainger, A. J., Tanner, S. F., Shelley, D. M., Pease, C., Emery, P., & McGonagle, D. (2005). High‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.