Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 909

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

Mease, Philip J., Gladman, Dafna D., Ritchlin, Christopher T., Ruderman, Eric M., Steinfeld, Serge D., Choy, Ernest H.S., Sharp, John T., Ory, Peter A., Perdok, Renee J., Weinberg, Mark A.·2005·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Adalimumab, a fully human, anti–tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for its safety and efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods: Patients with moderately to severely active PsA and a history of inadequate response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were randomized to receive 40 mg adalimumab or placebo subcutaneously every other week for 24 weeks. Study visits were at baseline, weeks 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary efficacy end points were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 12 and the change in the modified total Sharp score of structural damage at week 24. Secondary end points were measures of joint disease, disability, and quality of life in all patients, as well as the severity of skin disease in those patients with psoriasis involving at least 3% of body surface area. Results: At week 12, 58% of the adalimumab‐treated patients (87 of 151) achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 14% of the placebo‐treated patients (23 of 162) (P < 0.001). At week 24, similar ACR20 response rates were maintained and the mean change in the modified total Sharp score was −0.2 in patients receiving adalimumab and 1.0 in those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). Among the 69 adalimumab‐treated patients evaluated with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), 59% achieved a 75% PASI improvement response at 24 weeks, compared with 1% of the 69 placebo‐treated patients evaluated (P < 0.001). Disability and quality of life measures were also significantly improved with adalimumab treatment compared with placebo. Adalimumab was generally safe and well‐tolerated. Conclusion: Adalimumab significantly improved joint and skin manifestations, inhibited structural changes on radiographs, lessened disability due to joint damage, and improved quality of life in patients with moderately to severely active PsA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.21306

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 909

Metadata

Authors
Mease, P. J., Gladman, D. D., Ritchlin, C. T., Ruderman, E. M., Steinfeld, S. D., Choy, E. H. S., Sharp, J. T., Ory, P. A., Perdok, R. J., & Weinberg, M. A.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-30
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
3279-3289
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2133696182
Cited by
909
References
3
FWCI
32.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.21306
The paper
Mease, P. J., Gladman, D. D., Ritchlin, C. T., Ruderman, E. M., Steinfeld, S. D., Choy, E. H. S., Sharp, J. T., Ory, P. A., Perdok, R. J., & Weinberg, M. A. (2005). Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: Results of a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.