Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The comparative one‐year performance of anti–tumor necrosis factor α drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: Results from a longitudinal, observational, multicenter study

Heiberg, Marte Schrumpf, Koldingsnes, Wenche, Mikkelsen, Knut, Rødevand, Erik, Kaufmann, Cecilie, Mowinckel, Petter, Kvien, Tore K.·2008·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To compare the 1‐year retention rates of anti–tumor necrosis factor α (anti‐TNFα) medications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with complementary analyses of the effect on health status. Methods: Our analyses comprised 847, 172, and 249 anti‐TNFα treatment courses in patients with RA, PsA, and AS, respectively. Crude drug survival was compared and hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment termination were calculated with adjustments for age, sex, investigator's global assessment, and concomitant methotrexate (MTX). Adjusted changes in health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) were compared among the groups. Results: Unadjusted 1‐year retention rates were 65.4%, 77.3%, and 77.5% in the RA, PsA, and AS groups, respectively. The adjusted HRs for treatment termination were 0.76 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.53–1.07) for PsA versus RA and 0.66 (95% CI 0.47–0.92) for AS versus RA. High baseline disease activity and female sex were significantly associated with premature treatment termination, whereas concomitant MTX was associated with better drug survival. However, the impact of MTX was apparent for RA and PsA, but not for AS in stratified analyses. The improvements in HRQOL were superior in patients with PsA and AS compared with RA. Conclusion: Our results suggest that survival of anti‐TNFα treatment is superior in AS and PsA patients compared with RA patients. Larger improvements in HRQOL in patients with spondylarthritides may contribute to the differences in drug survival. Concomitant MTX was associated with better retention rates in RA and PsA patients, but not AS patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.23333

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Heiberg, M. S., Koldingsnes, W., Mikkelsen, K., Rødevand, E., Kaufmann, C., Mowinckel, P., & Kvien, T. K.
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01-31
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
234-240
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W2084560920
Cited by
256
References
24
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The comparative one‐year performance of anti–tumor necrosis factor α drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: Results from a longitudinal, observational, multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.23333
The paper
Heiberg, M. S., Koldingsnes, W., Mikkelsen, K., Rødevand, E., Kaufmann, C., Mowinckel, P., & Kvien, T. K. (2008). The comparative one‐year performance of anti–tumor necrosis factor α drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: Results from a longitudinal, observational, multicenter study. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23333

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.