Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 745

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: A French nationwide prospective multicenter study

Hachulla, Eric, Gressin, Virginie, Guillevin, Loïc, Carpentier, Patrick, Diot, Elisabeth, Sibilia, Jean, Kahan, André, Cabane, Jean, Francès, Camille, Launay, David, Mouthon, Luc, Allanore, Yannick, Tiev, Kiet Phong, Clerson, Pierre, Groote, Pascal de, Humbert, Marc·2005·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Screening allows for early management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a severe complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Since no consensus has been reached on the method and criteria for optimal screening, we sought to develop an algorithm based on symptoms, Doppler echocardiography, and right heart catheterization (RHC) for application to a nationwide multicenter SSc population in France. Methods: This prospective study was conducted from September 2002 to July 2003 by experts at 21 SSc centers. At each center, SSc patients without severe pulmonary function abnormalities underwent Doppler echocardiography by an experienced cardiologist. Patients with a peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (VTR) of >3 meters/second or 2.5–3 meters/second with unexplained dyspnea were asked to undergo RHC to confirm PAH according to international guidelines. Results: Of the 599 patients analyzed, 29 had known PAH and 33 had suspected PAH, based on Doppler echocardiography, and underwent RHC. Of these 33, 18 were found to have PAH, 3 had left ventricular dysfunction, and 12 had no PAH. Newly diagnosed cases of PAH were of mild severity (mean ± SD pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP] 30 ± 9 mm Hg, mean ± SD total pulmonary resistance [TPR] 524 ± 382 dynes × second/cm 5 ). Hemodynamic findings in patients with known PAH were mPAP 49 ± 17 mm Hg and TPR 1,007 ± 615 dynes × second/cm 5 . The estimate of PAH prevalence was 7.85% (95% confidence interval 5.70–10.00). Conclusion: This screening algorithm, based on dyspnea, Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of VTR, and RHC, enabled early detection of PAH at a mild stage. Whether mild PAH will evolve to severe PAH in reported cases and whether this early diagnosis translates into improved prognosis for patients with mild PAH will be evaluated in the ongoing 3‐year followup of this cohort.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.21433

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 745

Metadata

Authors
Hachulla, E., Gressin, V., Guillevin, L., Carpentier, P., Diot, E., Sibilia, J., Kahan, A., Cabane, J., Francès, C., Launay, D., Mouthon, L., Allanore, Y., Tiev, K. P., Clerson, P., Groote, P. D., & Humbert, M.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-30
Volume
52
Issue
12
Pages
3792-3800
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2055147321
Cited by
745
References
0
FWCI
24.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: A French nationwide prospective multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.21433
The paper
Hachulla, E., Gressin, V., Guillevin, L., Carpentier, P., Diot, E., Sibilia, J., Kahan, A., Cabane, J., Francès, C., Launay, D., Mouthon, L., Allanore, Y., Tiev, K. P., Clerson, P., Groote, P. D., & Humbert, M. (2005). Early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: A French nationwide prospective multicenter study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21433

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.