The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Repetitive 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: A prospective study of 35 patients
Abstract
Objective: To study fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the different vascular beds and in the large joints of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) at diagnosis, during steroid treatment, and at relapse. Methods: All consecutive patients admitted to our department with a diagnosis of GCA underwent FDG–positron emission tomography (PET) scan before treatment with methylprednisolone was started. PET scans were repeated at 3 and 6 months, if the initial PET scans showed vascular FDG uptake. PET scans were scored at 7 different vascular areas and a total vascular score (TVS) was calculated, ranging from 0 to 21. Results: A total of 35 patients entered the study. At diagnosis, vascular FDG uptake was noted in 29 patients (83%), especially in the subclavian arteries (74%), but also in the aorta (>50%) and up to the femoral arteries (37%). TVS decreased from a mean ± SD score of 7.9 ± 5.5 at baseline to 2.4 ± 3.5 on repeat PET scan at 3 months (P < 0.0005), but did not further decrease at 6 months. The patients who relapsed had similar earlier decreases of TVS compared with those who did not relapse. FDG uptake in the shoulders at diagnosis correlated significantly with the presence of polymyalgia rheumatica (P = 0.005). Conclusion: FDG uptake in the large vessels is a sensitive marker for GCA, which can involve the larger thoracic, abdominal, and peripheral arteries. Polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms in patients with GCA correlate with (peri)synovitis of the shoulders. Relapses of GCA cannot be predicted by results of former PET scintigraphies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Erbel (2014) · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 · Cited by 4,451
Isselbacher, E. M., Preventza, O., Hamilton Black, J., Augoustides, J. G., Beck, A. W., Bolen, M. A., Braverman, A. C., Bray, B. E., Brown-Zimmerman, M. M., Chen, E. P., et al. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001106 · Cited by 2,082
Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis
Salvarani, C., Cantini, F., & Hunder, G. G. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61077-6 · Cited by 767
Dejaco, C., Duftner, C., Buttgereit, F., Matteson, E. L., & Dasgupta, B. (2016) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kew273 · Cited by 365
Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica
Stone, J. R., Pless, M., Salvarani, C., Pipitone, N., Lessell, S., & Stone, J. H. (2009) · A Clinician's Pearls and Myths in Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-934-9_27 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Blockmans, D., Ceuninck, L. D., Vanderschueren, S., Knockaert, D., Mortelmans, L., & Bobbaers, H.
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02-06
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-137
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0123
- OpenAlex
- W2017295541
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repetitive 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: A prospective study of 35 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.21699
- The paper
- Blockmans, D., Ceuninck, L. D., Vanderschueren, S., Knockaert, D., Mortelmans, L., & Bobbaers, H. (2006). Repetitive 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: A prospective study of 35 patients. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.