The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impaired recognition of apoptotic neutrophils by the C1q/calreticulin and CD91 pathway in systemic lupus erythematosus
Abstract
Objective: A deficiency in a subcomponent of C1q can result in increased susceptibility to autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The monocyte endocytic receptor CD91 is implicated in the endocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils via interactions with C1q and calreticulin. In this clinical study, we studied the binding of C1q to leukocytes and determined whether C1q bound specifically to calreticulin and CD91 on cells undergoing apoptosis in SLE. Methods: Proximal antibody phage display, calreticulin‐transfected cells, and immunocytochemical and confocal techniques were used in a comprehensive analysis of direct binding of C1q to apoptotic neutrophils that were obtained from healthy individuals and from patients with SLE. In addition, apoptotic cellular systems were assessed in vitro. Results: C1q appeared to colocalize to apoptotic blebs on the surface of leukocytes in association with both calreticulin and CD91, as determined by phage display and transfected cell studies. However, C1q did not bind to apoptotic cells isolated from SLE patients, despite the positivity of the cells for both calreticulin and CD91. Surface expression of calreticulin decreased on neutrophils as they aged, but increased on monocytes. In an apoptotic phagocytic assay, the addition of C1q and calreticulin significantly enhanced the phagocytosis of apoptotic cell debris by monocyte‐derived cells. Conclusion: These observations indicate that neutrophils from SLE patients have a reduced ability to be recognized and removed by the C1q/calreticulin/CD91‐mediated apoptotic pathway, despite the presence of main apoptotic recognition partners. This suggests that an additional component, as yet unidentified, acts as a C1q binding partner on apoptotic cells, and this component may be lacking in cells isolated from SLE patients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Calreticulin and LRPAP1 both bind LRP1, but calreticulin is an agonist and co-receptor with LRP1, while LRPAP1 is an antagonist of LRP1.
“Calreticulin and LRPAP1 both bind LRP1, but calreticulin is an agonist and co-receptor with LRP1 (67, 68), while LRPAP1 is an antagonist of LRP1.”
From LRPAP1 is released from activated microglia and inhibits microglial phagocytosis and amyloid beta aggregation (2023) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cites
Savill, J. S., Wyllie, A. H., Henson, J. E., Walport, M. J., Henson, P. M., & Haslett, C. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci113970 · Cited by 1,536
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1016/S0171-2985(98)80032-6 · DOI
- 10.1159/000019076 · DOI
- 10.1006/clin.1996.4293 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00251-005-0023-z · DOI
- 10.1191/0961203303lu329oa · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80373-O · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.182.5.1545 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35037722 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3978 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-9258-1_15 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.194.6.781 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.177.1.1 · DOI
- 10.1006/clin.1994.1160 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1999.00794.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1997.3761273.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01373-7 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi973197p · DOI
- 10.1006/jaut.1997.0147 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01214.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00473.x · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.181.4.1557 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.1780251101 · DOI · Paper page
- Hay EM, 1993, The BILAG index: a reliable and valid instrument for measuring clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus, Q J Med, 86, 447
- 10.4049/jimmunol.165.2.878 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M202200200 · DOI
- 10.1038/343170a0 · DOI
- McConnell JR, 2002, Neutrophils from systemic lupus erythematosus patients demonstrate increased nuclear DNA damage, Clin Exp Rheumatol, 20, 653
- 10.4049/jimmunol.158.10.4525 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.3231 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M302306200 · DOI
- Chan EY, 1997, Increased rate of apoptosis and decreased expression of bcl‐2 protein in peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus, Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 15, 3
- 10.1191/0961203302lu223oa · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3198 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01381.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01218.x · DOI
- Malhotra R, 1993, Structure and homology of human C1q receptor (collectin receptor), Immunology, 78, 341
- Kumar A, 1999, Anti‐C1q antibody as a marker of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus, Indian J Med Res, 110, 190
- 10.1191/096120399678847849 · DOI
- Curry JL, 2003, Innate immune‐related receptors in normal and psoriatic skin, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 127, 178, 10.5858/2003-127-178-IIRRIN · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00419.x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M101691200 · DOI
- 10.1006/cbir.2000.0561 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.192.3.359 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaut.2005.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj2620625 · DOI
- Erdei A, 1988, Characterization of C1q‐binding material released from the membranes of Raji and U937 cells by limited proteolysis with trypsin, Biochem J, 255, 493
- Eggleton P, 1994, Characterization of the human neutrophil C1q receptor and functional effects of free ligand on activated neutrophils, Blood, 84, 1640, 10.1182/blood.V84.5.1640.1640 · DOI
- 10.1078/0171-2985-00142 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2000.00674.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1997.d01-999.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-2478(03)00066-X · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02263.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Complement in removal of the dead – balancing inflammation
Martin, M., & Blom, A. M. (2016) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12462 · Cited by 130
Reid, K. M., & Brown, G. C. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1286474 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnelly, S., Roake, W., Brown, S., Young, P., Naik, H., Wordsworth, P., Isenberg, D. A., Reid, K. B. M., & Eggleton, P.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-27
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1543-1556
- ISSN
- 0004-3591
- 1529-0131
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review