Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical differences between idiopathic and scleroderma‐related pulmonary hypertension

Fisher, Micah R., Mathai, Stephen C., Champion, Hunter C., Girgis, Reda E., Housten‐Harris, Traci, Hummers, Laura, Krishnan, Jerry A., Wigley, Fredrick, Hassoun, Paul M.·2006·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Pulmonary arterial hypertension related to scleroderma (PAH‐Scl) is associated with high morbidity and mortality as well as poorer response to therapy and worse outcomes compared with the idiopathic form of PAH (IPAH). Scleroderma is an autoimmune disease that can affect left and right heart function directly through inflammation and fibrosis and indirectly through systemic and pulmonary hypertension. This study tested the hypothesis that an increased prevalence of left heart disease might explain the higher mortality in patients with PAH‐Scl compared with patients with IPAH. Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective cohort study comparing the baseline clinical data from 91 consecutive patients (41 with IPAH and 50 with PAH‐Scl). Cox proportional hazards models were used to predict the effect of clinical covariates on patient survival. Results: Patients with PAH‐Scl had a lower mean pulmonary artery pressure (46.6 mm Hg versus 54.4 mm Hg in patients with IPAH; P = 0.002) despite similar levels of cardiac dysfunction (cardiac index 2.2 and 2.1 liters/minute/m 2, respectively; P = 0.19). Echocardiography revealed similar degrees of right ventricular dysfunction in the 2 groups, whereas a predominance of left heart dysfunction was observed in patients with PAH‐Scl. One‐ and three‐year survival estimates were 87.8% and 48.9%, respectively, in patients with PAH‐Scl and 95.1% and 83.6%, respectively, in those with IPAH. Patients with PAH‐Scl were 3.06 times more likely to die than were patients with IPAH, after controlling for the presence of pericardial effusion; there was no significant change in increased risk of death in PAH‐Scl after controlling for left heart disease. Conclusion: The results confirm that there are significant clinical and survival differences between IPAH and PAH‐Scl. The presence of left heart disease, although more common in PAH‐Scl, was not predictive of the higher mortality in these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.22069

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, M. R., Mathai, S. C., Champion, H. C., Girgis, R. E., Housten‐Harris, T., Hummers, L., Krishnan, J. A., Wigley, F., & Hassoun, P. M.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08-31
Volume
54
Issue
9
Pages
3043-3050
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2069038734
Cited by
349
References
1
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical differences between idiopathic and scleroderma‐related pulmonary hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22069
The paper
Fisher, M. R., Mathai, S. C., Champion, H. C., Girgis, R. E., Housten‐Harris, T., Hummers, L., Krishnan, J. A., Wigley, F., & Hassoun, P. M. (2006). Clinical differences between idiopathic and scleroderma‐related pulmonary hypertension. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22069

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.