Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits

Open access
Hewlett, Sarah, Wit, Maarten de, Richards, Pam, Quest, Enid, Hughes, Rod, Heiberg, Turid, Kirwan, John·2006·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Patient or consumer involvement in research is widely recommended, but although guidelines for researchers and patients have been produced, few practical experiences have been published and involvement remains fragile. This article reports the combined experiences of researchers and patients who are collaborating in rheumatology research, and the working model that has evolved. The article provides one example of a practical model for collaboration based on experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.22091

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Hewlett, S., Wit, M. D., Richards, P., Quest, E., Hughes, R., Heiberg, T., & Kirwan, J.
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-27
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
676-680
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W2001949601
Cited by
272
References
0
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22091
The paper
Hewlett, S., Wit, M. D., Richards, P., Quest, E., Hughes, R., Heiberg, T., & Kirwan, J. (2006). Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22091

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.