Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gabapentin in the treatment of fibromyalgia: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter trial

Open access
Arnold, Lesley M., Goldenberg, Don L., Stanford, Sharon B., Lalonde, Justine K., Sandhu, H. S., Keck, Paul E., Welge, Jeffrey A., Bishop, Fred, Stanford, Kevin E., Hess, Evelyn V., Hudson, James I.·2007·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in patients with fibromyalgia. Methods: A 12‐week, randomized, double‐blind study was designed to compare gabapentin (1,200–2,400 mg/day) (n = 75 patients) with placebo (n = 75 patients) for efficacy and safety in treating pain associated with fibromyalgia. The primary outcome measure was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain severity score (range 0–10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine). Response to treatment was defined as a reduction of ≥30% in this score. The primary analysis of efficacy for continuous variables was a longitudinal analysis of the intent‐to‐treat sample, with treatment‐by‐time interaction as the measure of effect. Results: Gabapentin‐treated patients displayed a significantly greater improvement in the BPI average pain severity score (P= 0.015; estimated difference between groups at week 12 = −0.92 [95% confidence interval −1.75, −0.71]). A significantly greater proportion of gabapentin‐treated patients compared with placebo‐treated patients achieved response at end point (51% versus 31%;P= 0.014). Gabapentin compared with placebo also significantly improved the BPI average pain interference score, the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score, the Clinical Global Impression of Severity, the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Problems Index, and the MOS Short Form 36 vitality score, but not the mean tender point pain threshold or the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Gabapentin was generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Gabapentin (1,200–2,400 mg/day) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of pain and other symptoms associated with fibromyalgia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.22457

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 329

Metadata

Authors
Arnold, L. M., Goldenberg, D. L., Stanford, S. B., Lalonde, J. K., Sandhu, H. S., Keck, P. E., Welge, J. A., Bishop, F., Stanford, K. E., Hess, E. V., & Hudson, J. I.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-28
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
1336-1344
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2009137120
Cited by
329
References
44
FWCI
23.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gabapentin in the treatment of fibromyalgia: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22457
The paper
Arnold, L. M., Goldenberg, D. L., Stanford, S. B., Lalonde, J. K., Sandhu, H. S., Keck, P. E., Welge, J. A., Bishop, F., Stanford, K. E., Hess, E. V., & Hudson, J. I. (2007). Gabapentin in the treatment of fibromyalgia: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22457

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.