Cited by 243Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with gabapentin and pregabalin – A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Häuser, Winfried, Bernardy, Kathrin, Üçeyler, Nurcan, Sommer, Claudia·2009·Pain

Abstract

The efficacy of gabapentin (GPT) and pregabalin (PGB) in the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) was assessed. We screened MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, www.clinicaltrials.org, the Cochrane Library (through October 2008), and the reference sections of original studies on GPT/PGB in FMS. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of FMS with GPT and PGB were analyzed. Six out of 127 RCTs studying 2422 subjects on treatment with GPT (one study) or PGB (five studies) and 1056 subjects on placebo with a median treatment duration of 11 weeks were included into the systematic review. Five studies were suitable for meta-analysis. Effects were summarized using standardized mean differences (SMD). There was strong evidence for a reduction of pain (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.36, -0.20; p<0.001), improved sleep (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.48, -0.39; p<0.001), and improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.46, -0.15; p<0.001), but not for depressed mood (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.30, 0.06; p=0.18). There was strong evidence for a non-substantial reduction of fatigue (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.23, -0.09, p<0.001) and of anxiety (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.27, -0.10; p<0.001). The external validity of the studies was limited because patients with severe somatic and mental disorders were excluded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2009.05.014

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Häuser, W., Bernardy, K., Üçeyler, N., & Sommer, C.
Affiliations
  • Klinikum Saarbrücken (DE)
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Häuser, Winfried
Venue
Pain
Published
2009-09
Volume
145
Issue
1
Pages
69-81
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023541450
Cited by
243
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, gabapentin, pregabalin, analgesia, sleep quality, health-related quality of life, fatigue, anxiety, depressive mood, antiepileptic drugs
MeSH terms
Pregabalin, Gabapentin, Amines, Analgesics, Calcium Channel Blockers, Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids, Fibromyalgia, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Bibliographic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review