The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee
Abstract
Objective: Although knee malalignment is assumed to correlate with knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is still unknown whether malalignment precedes the development of OA or whether it is a result of OA. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between malalignment and the development of knee OA as well as progression of knee OA. Methods: A total of 1,501 participants in the Rotterdam study were randomly selected. Knee OA at baseline and at followup (mean followup 6.6 years) was scored according to the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading system. Alignment was measured by the femorotibial angle on radiographs at baseline. Multivariable logistic regression for repeated measurements was used to analyze the association of malalignment with the development and progression of OA. Results: Of 2,664 knees, 1,012 (38%) were considered to have normal alignment, 693 (26%) had varus alignment, and 959 (36%) had valgus alignment. A comparison of valgus alignment and normal alignment showed that valgus alignment was associated with a borderline significant increase in development of knee OA (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.97–2.44), and varus alignment was associated with a 2‐fold increased risk (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.28–3.32). Stratification for body mass index showed that this increased risk was especially seen in overweight and obese individuals but not in non‐overweight persons. The risk of OA progression was also significantly increased in the group with varus alignment compared with the group with normal alignment (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.07–7.88). Conclusion: An increasing degree of varus alignment is associated not only with progression of knee OA but also with development of knee OA. However, this association seems particularly applicable to overweight and obese persons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
Murphy, L., Schwartz, T. A., Helmick, C. G., Renner, J. B., Tudor, G., Koch, G., Dragomir, A., Kalsbeek, W. D., Luta, G., & Jordan, J. M. (2008) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.24021 · Cited by 1,051
The epidemiology of osteoarthritis
Johnson, V. L., & Hunter, D. J. (2014) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2014.01.004 · Cited by 1,020
Osteoarthritis as a disease of mechanics
Felson, D. T. (2013) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.012 · Cited by 676
Braces and orthoses for treating osteoarthritis of the knee
Duivenvoorden, T., Brouwer, R. W., van Raaij, T. M., Verhagen, A. P., Verhaar, J. A., & Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004020.pub3 · Cited by 314
Self-citationBarrios, J. A., Crossley, K. M., & Davis, I. S. (2010) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.040 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Brouwer, G. M., Tol, A. W. V., Bergink, A. P., Belo, J. N., Bernsen, R. M. D., Reijman, M., Pols, H. A. P., & Bierma‐Zeinstra, S. M. A.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-28
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1204-1211
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W1979659750
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22515
- The paper
- Brouwer, G. M., Tol, A. W. V., Bergink, A. P., Belo, J. N., Bernsen, R. M. D., Reijman, M., Pols, H. A. P., & Bierma‐Zeinstra, S. M. A. (2007). Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.