Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 413

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy of methotrexate treatment in patients with probable rheumatoid arthritis: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

van Dongen, Henrike, van Aken, Jill, Lard, Leroy R., Visser, Karen, Ronday, H. Karel, Hulsmans, Harry M. J., Speyer, Irene, Westedt, Marie‐Louise, Peeters, André J., Allaart, Cornelia F., Toes, René E. M., Breedveld, Ferdinand C., Huizinga, Tom W. J.·2007·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA; inflammatory, nontraumatic arthritis that cannot be diagnosed using current classification criteria) benefit from treatment with methotrexate (MTX). Methods: The PRObable rheumatoid arthritis: Methotrexate versus Placebo Treatment (PROMPT) study was a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized, multicenter trial involving 110 patients with UA who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1958 criteria for probable RA. Treatment started with MTX (15 mg/week) or placebo tablets, and every 3 months the dosage was increased if the Disease Activity Score was >2.4. After 12 months, the study medication was tapered and discontinued. Patients were followed up for 30 months. When a patient fulfilled the ACR criteria for RA (primary end point), the study medication was changed to MTX. Joint damage was scored on radiographs of the hands and feet. Results: In 22 of the 55 patients (40%) in the MTX group, UA progressed to RA compared with 29 of 55 patients (53%) in the placebo group. However, in the MTX group, patients fulfilled the ACR criteria for RA at a later time point than in the placebo group (P = 0.04), and fewer patients showed radiographic progression over 18 months (P = 0.046). Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the efficacy of MTX treatment in postponing the diagnosis of RA, as defined by the ACR 1987 criteria, and retarding radiographic joint damage in UA patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.22525

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 413

Metadata

Authors
van Dongen, H., van Aken, J., Lard, L. R., Visser, K., Ronday, H. K., Hulsmans, H. M. J., Speyer, I., Westedt, M., Peeters, A. J., Allaart, C. F., Toes, R. E. M., Breedveld, F. C., & Huizinga, T. W. J.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-27
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
1424-1432
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2071054988
Cited by
413
References
0
FWCI
23.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of methotrexate treatment in patients with probable rheumatoid arthritis: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22525
The paper
van Dongen, H., van Aken, J., Lard, L. R., Visser, K., Ronday, H. K., Hulsmans, H. M. J., Speyer, I., Westedt, M., Peeters, A. J., Allaart, C. F., Toes, R. E. M., Breedveld, F. C., & Huizinga, T. W. J. (2007). Efficacy of methotrexate treatment in patients with probable rheumatoid arthritis: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22525

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.