Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 562

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who respond to anti–tumor necrosis factor α therapy: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register

Open access
Dixon, W. G., Watson, K. D., Lunt, M., Hyrich, K. L., Silman, A. J., Symmons, D. P. M.·2007·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease, possibly acting via shared mechanisms of inflammation. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that the powerful antiinflammatory effect of anti–tumor necrosis α (anti‐TNFα) therapy might lead to a reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with RA. Methods: Using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, a national prospective observational study, we compared MI rates in 8,670 patients with RA treated with anti‐TNFα and 2,170 patients with active RA treated with traditional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Results: Through July 2006, 63 MIs occurred in the anti‐TNFα cohort during 13,233 person‐years of followup and 17 MIs occurred in the DMARD cohort during 2,893 person‐years of followup, equivalent to a rate of 4.8 events per 1,000 person‐years and 5.9 events per 1,000 person‐years, respectively. After adjustment for baseline risk factors, there was no reduction in the rate of MI in the anti‐TNFα cohort compared with the DMARD cohort (incidence rate ratio 1.44 [95% confidence interval 0.56–3.67]). In an analysis of anti‐TNFα–treated patients who responded to the treatment within 6 months versus those who did not, MI rates were found to be 3.5 events per 1,000 person‐years in responders and 9.4 events per 1,000 person‐years in nonresponders. The adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) for responders compared with nonresponders was 0.36 (0.19–0.69). Conclusion: These results indicate that RA patients treated with anti‐TNFα do not have a lower incidence of MI compared with RA patients treated with traditional DMARDs. However, the risk of MI is markedly reduced in those who respond to anti‐TNFα therapy by 6 months compared with nonresponders. This finding supports the notion that inflammation plays a pivotal role in MI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.22809

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 562

Metadata

Authors
Dixon, W. G., Watson, K. D., Lunt, M., Hyrich, K. L., Silman, A. J., & Symmons, D. P. M.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-30
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
2905-2912
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2075619622
Cited by
562
References
6
FWCI
27.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who respond to anti–tumor necrosis factor α therapy: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22809
The paper
Dixon, W. G., Watson, K. D., Lunt, M., Hyrich, K. L., Silman, A. J., & Symmons, D. P. M. (2007). Reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who respond to anti–tumor necrosis factor α therapy: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22809

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.