Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta‐analysis of observational studies

Aviña‐Zubieta, J. Antonio, Choi, Hyon K., Sadatsafavi, Mohsen, Etminan, Mahyar, Esdaile, John M., Lacaille, Diane·2008·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To determine the magnitude of risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with the general population through a meta‐analysis of observational studies. Methods: We searched Medline, EMBase, and Lilacs databases from their inception to July 2005. Observational studies that met the following criteria were assessed by 2 researchers: 1) prespecified RA definition, 2) clearly defined cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome, including ischemic heart disease (IHD) and cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), and 3) reported standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We calculated weighted–pooled summary estimates of SMRs (meta‐SMRs) for CVD, IHD, and CVAs using the random‐effects model, and tested for heterogeneity using the I 2 statistic. Results: Twenty‐four studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 111,758 patients with 22,927 cardiovascular events. Overall, there was a 50% increased risk of CVD death in patients with RA (meta‐SMR 1.50, 95% CI 1.39–1.61). Mortality risks for IHD and CVA were increased by 59% and 52%, respectively (meta‐SMR 1.59, 95% CI 1.46–1.73 and meta‐SMR 1.52, 95% CI 1.40–1.67, respectively). We identified asymmetry in the funnel plot (Egger's test P = 0.002), as well as significant heterogeneity in all main analyses (P < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses showed that inception cohort studies (n = 4, comprising 2,175 RA cases) were the only group that did not show a significantly increased risk for CVD (meta‐SMR 1.19, 95% CI 0.86–1.68). Conclusion: Published data indicate that CVD mortality is increased by ∼50% in RA patients compared with the general population. However, we found that study characteristics may influence the estimate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.24092

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,462

Metadata

Authors
Aviña‐Zubieta, J. A., Choi, H. K., Sadatsafavi, M., Etminan, M., Esdaile, J. M., & Lacaille, D.
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-26
Volume
59
Issue
12
Pages
1690-1697
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W2015410646
Cited by
1,462
References
5
FWCI
24.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta‐analysis of observational studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.24092
The paper
Aviña‐Zubieta, J. A., Choi, H. K., Sadatsafavi, M., Etminan, M., Esdaile, J. M., & Lacaille, D. (2008). Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta‐analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.