Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 788

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and validation of a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Open access
Consolaro, Alessandro, Ruperto, Nicolino, Bazso, Anna, Pistorio, Angela, Magni‐Manzoni, Silvia, Filocamo, Giovanni, Malattia, Clara, Viola, Stefania, Martini, Alberto, Ravelli, Angelo·2009·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS). Methods: The JADAS includes 4 measures: physician global assessment of disease activity, parent/patient global assessment of well‐being, active joint count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. These variables are part of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30 (Pedi 30), Pedi 50, and Pedi 70 criteria for improvement. Validation analyses were conducted on >4,500 patients and included assessment of construct validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change. Three versions of the JADAS were tested based on 71‐joint (range 0–101), 27‐joint (range 0–57), or 10‐joint (range 0–40) counts. Statistical performances of the JADAS were compared with those of 2 rheumatoid arthritis composite scores, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Results: The JADAS demonstrated good construct validity, yielding strong correlations with JIA activity measures not included in the score and moderate correlations with the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire. Correlations obtained for the 3 JADAS versions were comparable, but superior to those yielded by the DAS28 and CDAI. The area under the curve of the JADAS predicted long‐term disease outcome, measured as radiographic progression over 3 years. In 2 clinical trials, the JADAS discriminated well between ACR Pedi 30, Pedi 50, and Pedi 70 response and revealed strong responsiveness to clinical change. Conclusion: The JADAS was found to be a valid instrument for assessment of disease activity in JIA and is potentially applicable in standard clinical care, observational studies, and clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.24516

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 788

Metadata

Authors
Consolaro, A., Ruperto, N., Bazso, A., Pistorio, A., Magni‐Manzoni, S., Filocamo, G., Malattia, C., Viola, S., Martini, A., & Ravelli, A.
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-29
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
658-666
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W2024714476
Cited by
788
References
20
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and validation of a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.24516
The paper
Consolaro, A., Ruperto, N., Bazso, A., Pistorio, A., Magni‐Manzoni, S., Filocamo, G., Malattia, C., Viola, S., Martini, A., & Ravelli, A. (2009). Development and validation of a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24516

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.