Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 368

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does rheumatoid arthritis equal diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease? A prospective study

Peters, Mike J. L., van Halm, Vokko P., Voskuyl, Alexandre E., Smulders, Yvo M., Boers, Maarten, Lems, Willem F., Visser, Marjolein, Stehouwer, Coen D. A., Dekker, Jacqueline M., Nijpels, Giel, Heine, Rob, Dijkmans, Ben A. C., Nurmohamed, Michael T.·2009·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but longitudinal observations are limited and the precise magnitude is unknown. We prospectively assessed the incidence of CVD in patients with RA compared with patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and the general population. Methods: The 3‐year incidence rate of CVD was determined in a prospective cohort (the Cardiovascular Research and Rheumatoid Arthritis Study) of 353 outpatients with RA, and was compared with that in 1,852 population‐based cohort study participants (155 had type 2 DM). We investigated fatal and nonfatal CVD (according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision criteria) and used Cox proportional hazards models to assess the incidence of CVD in RA, type 2 DM, and the general population. Results: The 3‐year incidence of CVD was 9.0% in patients with RA and 4.3% in the general population, corresponding with an incidence rate of 3.30 per 100 patient‐years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.08–4.25) and 1.51 per 100 person‐years (95% CI 1.18–1.84), respectively. Compared with the general population, the age‐ and sex‐adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for RA was 1.94 (95% CI 1.24–3.05, P = 0.004). Neither exclusion of patients with prior CVD at baseline nor adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors significantly influenced this. Compared with the nondiabetic population, nondiabetic patients with RA and those with type 2 DM had comparable HRs, 2.16 (95% CI 1.28–3.63, P = 0.004) and 2.04 (95% CI 1.12–3.67, P = 0.019), respectively. Conclusion: The risk of CVD in RA was significantly elevated compared with the general population, and comparable with the magnitude of risk in type 2 DM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.24836

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 368

Metadata

Authors
Peters, M. J. L., van Halm, V. P., Voskuyl, A. E., Smulders, Y. M., Boers, M., Lems, W. F., Visser, M., Stehouwer, C. D. A., Dekker, J. M., Nijpels, G., Heine, R., Dijkmans, B. A. C., & Nurmohamed, M. T.
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-29
Volume
61
Issue
11
Pages
1571-1579
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W2101139377
Cited by
368
References
3
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does rheumatoid arthritis equal diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease? A prospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.24836
The paper
Peters, M. J. L., van Halm, V. P., Voskuyl, A. E., Smulders, Y. M., Boers, M., Lems, W. F., Visser, M., Stehouwer, C. D. A., Dekker, J. M., Nijpels, G., Heine, R., Dijkmans, B. A. C., & Nurmohamed, M. T. (2009). Does rheumatoid arthritis equal diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease? A prospective study. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24836

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.