Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: Twenty‐four–hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, dose‐comparison colchicine study

Terkeltaub, Robert A., Furst, Daniel E., Bennett, Katherine, Kook, Karin A., Crockett, R. S., Davis, Matthew W.·2010·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Despite widespread use of colchicine, the evidence basis for oral colchicine therapy and dosing in acute gout remains limited. The aim of this trial was to compare low‐dose colchicine (abbreviated at 1 hour) and high‐dose colchicine (prolonged over 6 hours) with placebo in gout flare, using regimens producing comparable maximum plasma concentrations in healthy volunteers. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study compared self‐administered low‐dose colchicine (1.8 mg total over 1 hour) and high‐dose colchicine (4.8 mg total over 6 hours) with placebo. The primary end point was ≥50% pain reduction at 24 hours without rescue medication. Results: There were 184 patients in the intent‐to‐treat analysis. Responders included 28 of 74 patients (37.8%) in the low‐dose group, 17 of 52 patients (32.7%) in the high‐dose group, and 9 of 58 patients (15.5%) in the placebo group ( P = 0.005 and P = 0.034, respectively, versus placebo). Rescue medication was taken within the first 24 hours by 23 patients (31.1%) in the low‐dose group ( P = 0.027 versus placebo), 18 patients (34.6%) in the high‐dose group ( P = 0.103 versus placebo), and 29 patients (50.0%) in the placebo group. The low‐dose group had an adverse event (AE) profile similar to that of the placebo group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.7–3.2). High‐dose colchicine was associated with significantly more diarrhea, vomiting, and other AEs compared with low‐dose colchicine or placebo. With high‐dose colchicine, 40 patients (76.9%) had diarrhea (OR 21.3 [95% CI 7.9–56.9]), 10 (19.2%) had severe diarrhea, and 9 (17.3%) had vomiting. With low‐dose colchicine, 23.0% of the patients had diarrhea (OR 1.9 [95% CI 0.8–4.8]), none had severe diarrhea, and none had vomiting. Conclusion: Low‐dose colchicine yielded both maximum plasma concentration and early gout flare efficacy comparable with that of high‐dose colchicine, with a safety profile indistinguishable from that of placebo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.27327

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 536

Metadata

Authors
Terkeltaub, R. A., Furst, D. E., Bennett, K., Kook, K. A., Crockett, R. S., & Davis, M. W.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-30
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
1060-1068
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2094780098
Cited by
536
References
1
FWCI
28.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: Twenty‐four–hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, dose‐comparison colchicine study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.27327
The paper
Terkeltaub, R. A., Furst, D. E., Bennett, K., Kook, K. A., Crockett, R. S., & Davis, M. W. (2010). High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: Twenty‐four–hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, dose‐comparison colchicine study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.