Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 701

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: A randomized, placebo‐phase trial

Open access
Oddis, Chester V., Reed, Ann M., Aggarwal, Rohit, Rider, Lisa G., Ascherman, Dana P., Levesque, Marc C., Barohn, Richard J., Feldman, Brian M., Harris‐Love, Michael O., Koontz, Diane C., Fertig, Noreen, Kelley, Stephanie S., Pryber, Sherrie L., Miller, Frederick W., Rockette, Howard E., and the RIM Study Group·2013·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of rituximab in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐phase trial in adult and pediatric myositis patients. Methods: Adults with refractory polymyositis (PM) and adults and children with refractory dermatomyositis (DM) were enrolled. Entry criteria included muscle weakness and ≥2 additional abnormal values on core set measures (CSMs) for adults. Juvenile DM patients required ≥3 abnormal CSMs, with or without muscle weakness. Patients were randomized to receive either rituximab early or rituximab late, and glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive therapy was allowed at study entry. The primary end point compared the time to achieve the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group preliminary definition of improvement (DOI) between the 2 groups. The secondary end points were the time to achieve ≥20% improvement in muscle strength and the proportions of patients in the early and late rituximab groups achieving the DOI at week 8. Results: Among 200 randomized patients (76 with PM, 76 with DM, and 48 with juvenile DM), 195 showed no difference in the time to achieving the DOI between the rituximab late (n = 102) and rituximab early (n = 93) groups ( P = 0.74 by log rank test), with a median time to achieving a DOI of 20.2 weeks and 20.0 weeks, respectively. The secondary end points also did not significantly differ between the 2 treatment groups. However, 161 (83%) of the randomized patients met the DOI, and individual CSMs improved in both groups throughout the 44‐week trial. Conclusion: Although there were no significant differences in the 2 treatment arms for the primary and secondary end points, 83% of adult and juvenile myositis patients with refractory disease met the DOI. The role of B cell–depleting therapies in myositis warrants further study, with consideration for a different trial design.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.37754

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 701

Metadata

Authors
Oddis, C. V., Reed, A. M., Aggarwal, R., Rider, L. G., Ascherman, D. P., Levesque, M. C., Barohn, R. J., Feldman, B. M., Harris‐Love, M. O., Koontz, D. C., Fertig, N., Kelley, S. S., Pryber, S. L., Miller, F. W., Rockette, H. E., & and the RIM Study Group
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-28
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
314-324
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2076417190
Cited by
701
References
2
FWCI
27.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: A randomized, placebo‐phase trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.37754
The paper
Oddis, C. V., Reed, A. M., Aggarwal, R., Rider, L. G., Ascherman, D. P., Levesque, M. C., Barohn, R. J., Feldman, B. M., Harris‐Love, M. O., Koontz, D. C., Fertig, N., Kelley, S. S., Pryber, S. L., Miller, F. W., Rockette, H. E., & and the RIM Study Group. (2013). Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: A randomized, placebo‐phase trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.37754

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.