The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dual Role of Autophagy in Stress‐Induced Cell Death in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the role of autophagy in the regulation of cell death in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts (RASFs). Methods: RASFs and osteoarthritis synovial fibroblasts (OASFs) were treated with thapsigargin (TG), an inducer of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and MG132, a proteasome inhibitor. Then, 3‐methyladenine was used as an autophagy inhibitor and bafilomycin A1 as a lysosome inhibitor. Polyubiquitinated proteins, p62, and autophagy induction were evaluated by immunoblotting, immunofluorescence microscopy, and immunohistochemistry, respectively. OASFs were transfected with small interfering RNA targeting autophagy‐linked FYVE protein (ALFY). Cell death was evaluated by flow cytometry and a caspase 3 activity assay. Results: In RASFs, the induction of autophagy by TG and MG132 was increased compared to that in OASFs. Whereas autophagy promoted a caspase 3–independent induction of cell death under ER stress, autophagy had a protective role in apoptosis induced by proteasome inhibition. Treatment of RASFs with 3‐methyladenine blocked TG‐induced cell death. ER stress induced a strong accumulation of p62‐positive polyubiquitinated protein aggregates, accompanied by the formation of large vacuoles in RASFs but not OASFs. Furthermore, TG‐induced p62 protein expression was increased, whereas TG‐induced ALFY expression was reduced, in RASFs compared to OASFs. ALFY knockdown promoted the accumulation of p62, the formation of polyubiquitinated protein aggregates, and cell death. Conclusion: Our data provide the first evidence of a dual role of autophagy in the regulation of death pathways in RASFs. A reduced expression of ALFY and the formation of p62‐positive polyubiquitinated protein aggregates promote cell death in RASFs under severe ER stress.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SQSTM1 mRNA is also upregulated following prolonged starvation, which can restore the SQSTM1 protein level to that before starvation [577, 578].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [578]
In the citing paper
“Also, persistent MTORC1 inhibition can cause downregulation of negative feedback loops on IRS-MTORC2-AKT that results in the reactivation of MTORC2 under conditions of ongoing starvation [578, 774, 775].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [578]
Citations
Cites
Autophagy and the Integrated Stress Response
Kroemer, G., Mariño, G., & Levine, B. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.023 · Cited by 3,506
Structural Basis for Sorting Mechanism of p62 in Selective Autophagy
Ichimura, Y., Kumanomidou, T., Sou, Y.-S., Mizushima, T., Ezaki, J., Ueno, T., Kominami, E., Yamane, T., Tanaka, K., & Komatsu, M. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m802182200 · Cited by 803
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncprheum0699 · DOI
- 10.1038/446745a · DOI
- 10.1038/cdd.2011.96 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/ar2921 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.1780310302 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.1780290816 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/art.24140 · DOI
- Menzies FM, 2012, Measurement of autophagic activity in mammalian cells, Curr Protoc Cell Biol, 15, 15.6
- 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.197491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.026 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.01287 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.6.3.11226 · DOI
- 10.1186/ar3778 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20111783 · DOI
- 10.1093/carcin/17.8.1595 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401359 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2404 · DOI
- 10.1136/ard.2008.097709 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.27492 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.27690 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.003 · DOI
- Yao F, 2012, An autophagy inhibitor enhances the inhibition of cell proliferation induced by a proteasome inhibitor in MCF‐7 cells, Mol Med Rep, 5, 84
- 10.1002/cncr.27586 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2002.00394.x · DOI
- 10.1093/jnen/62.12.1241 · DOI
- 10.1053/jhep.2002.32674 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00011-012-0572-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citationInactivation of autophagy ameliorates glucocorticoid-induced and ovariectomy-induced bone loss
Lin, N.-Y., Chen, C.-W., Kagwiria, R., Liang, R., Beyer, C., Distler, A., Luther, J., Engelke, K., Schett, G., & Distler, J. H. (2016) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207240 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Kato, M., Ospelt, C., Gay, R. E., Gay, S., & Klein, K.
- Affiliations
- Center of Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-30
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-48
- ISSN
- 2326-5191
- 2326-5205
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review