Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,986

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Consensus and Data‐Driven Methodology Involving Three International Patient Cohorts

Open access
Shiboski, Caroline H., Shiboski, Stephen C., Seror, Raphaèle, Criswell, Lindsey A., Labetoulle, Marc, Lietman, Thomas M., Rasmussen, Astrid, Scofield, Hal, Vitali, Claudio, Bowman, Simon J., Mariette, Xavier, the International Sjögren's Syndrome Criteria Working Group·2017·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate an international set of classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) using guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). These criteria were developed for use in individuals with signs and/or symptoms suggestive of SS. Methods: We assigned preliminary importance weights to a consensus list of candidate criteria items, using multi‐criteria decision analysis. We tested and adapted the resulting draft criteria using existing cohort data on primary SS cases and non‐SS controls, with case/non‐case status derived from expert clinical judgment. We then validated the performance of the classification criteria in a separate cohort of patients. Results: The final classification criteria are based on the weighted sum of 5 items: anti‐SSA/Ro antibody positivity and focal lymphocytic sialadenitis with a focus score of ≥1 foci/4 mm 2 , each scoring 3; an abnormal ocular staining score of ≥5 (or van Bijsterveld score of ≥4), a Schirmer's test result of ≤5 mm/5 minutes, and an unstimulated salivary flow rate of ≤0.1 ml/minute, each scoring 1. Individuals with signs and/or symptoms suggestive of SS who have a total score of ≥4 for the above items meet the criteria for primary SS. Sensitivity and specificity against clinician‐expert–derived case/non‐case status in the final validation cohort were high, i.e., 96% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 92–98%) and 95% (95% CI 92–97%), respectively. Conclusion: Using methodology consistent with other recent ACR/EULAR‐approved classification criteria, we developed a single set of data‐driven consensus classification criteria for primary SS, which performed well in validation analyses and are well‐suited as criteria for enrollment in clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.39859

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,986

Metadata

Authors
Shiboski, C. H., Shiboski, S. C., Seror, R., Criswell, L. A., Labetoulle, M., Lietman, T. M., Rasmussen, A., Scofield, H., Vitali, C., Bowman, S. J., Mariette, X., & the International Sjögren's Syndrome Criteria Working Group
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-26
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
35-45
ISSN
  • 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5205
OpenAlex
W3022289262
Cited by
1,986
References
1
FWCI
47.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Consensus and Data‐Driven Methodology Involving Three International Patient Cohorts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.39859
The paper
Shiboski, C. H., Shiboski, S. C., Seror, R., Criswell, L. A., Labetoulle, M., Lietman, T. M., Rasmussen, A., Scofield, H., Vitali, C., Bowman, S. J., Mariette, X., & the International Sjögren's Syndrome Criteria Working Group. (2017). 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Consensus and Data‐Driven Methodology Involving Three International Patient Cohorts. Arthritis & Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39859

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.