Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

18F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography As an Imaging Biomarker in a Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort of Patients With Large Vessel Vasculitis

Open access
Grayson, Peter C., Alehashemi, Sara, Bagheri, Armin A., Civelek, Ali Cahid, Cupps, Thomas R., Kaplan, Mariana J., Malayeri, Ashkan A., Merkel, Peter A., Novakovich, Elaine, Bluemke, David A., Ahlman, Mark A.·2018·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective: To assess the clinical value of 18 F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in a prospective cohort of patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and comparator subjects. Methods: Patients with Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis were studied, along with a comparator group consisting of patients with hyperlipidemia, patients with diseases that mimic LVV, and healthy controls. Participants underwent clinical evaluation and FDG‐PET imaging, and patients with LVV underwent serial imaging at 6‐month intervals. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of FDG‐PET interpretation for distinguishing patients with clinically active LVV from comparator subjects and from patients with disease in clinical remission. A qualitative summary score based on global arterial FDG uptake, the PET Vascular Activity Score (PETVAS), was used to study associations between activity on PET scan and clinical characteristics and to predict relapse. Results: A total of 170 FDG‐PET scans were performed in 115 participants (56 patients with LVV and 59 comparator subjects). FDG‐PET distinguished patients with clinically active LVV from comparator subjects with a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 69, 94) and a specificity of 83% (95% CI 71, 91). FDG‐PET scans were interpreted as active vasculitis in most patients with LVV in clinical remission (41 of 71 [58%]). Clinical disease activity status, disease duration, body mass index, and glucocorticoid use were independently associated with activity on PET scan. Among patients who underwent PET during clinical remission, future clinical relapse was more common in patients with a high PETVAS than in those with a low PETVAS (55% versus 11%; P = 0.03) over a median follow‐up period of 15 months. Conclusion: FDG‐PET provides information about vascular inflammation that is complementary to, and distinct from, clinical assessment in LVV. FDG‐PET scan activity during clinical remission was associated with future clinical relapse.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.40379

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Grayson, P. C., Alehashemi, S., Bagheri, A. A., Civelek, A. C., Cupps, T. R., Kaplan, M. J., Malayeri, A. A., Merkel, P. A., Novakovich, E., Bluemke, D. A., & Ahlman, M. A.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-06
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
439-449
ISSN
  • 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5205
OpenAlex
W2769898966
Cited by
352
References
0
FWCI
22.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 18F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography As an Imaging Biomarker in a Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort of Patients With Large Vessel Vasculitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.40379
The paper
Grayson, P. C., Alehashemi, S., Bagheri, A. A., Civelek, A. C., Cupps, T. R., Kaplan, M. J., Malayeri, A. A., Merkel, P. A., Novakovich, E., Bluemke, D. A., & Ahlman, M. A. (2018). 18F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography As an Imaging Biomarker in a Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort of Patients With Large Vessel Vasculitis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40379

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.