The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice: 2023 update
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To update the EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging modalities in primary large vessel vasculitis (LVV). METHODS: F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction in LVV. The task force consisted of 24 physicians, health professionals and patients from 14 countries. The recommendations were updated based on evidence and expert opinion, iterating until voting indicated consensus. The level of agreement was determined by anonymous votes. RESULTS: Three overarching principles and eight recommendations were agreed. Compared to the 2018 version, ultrasound is now recommended as first-line imaging test in all patients with suspected giant cell arteritis, and axillary arteries should be included in the standard examination. As an alternative to ultrasound, cranial and extracranial arteries can be examined by FDG-PET or MRI. For Takayasu arteritis, MRI is the preferred imaging modality; FDG-PET, CT or ultrasound are alternatives. Although imaging is not routinely recommended for follow-up, ultrasound, FDG-PET or MRI may be used for assessing vessel abnormalities in LVV patients with suspected relapse, particularly when laboratory markers of inflammation are unreliable. MR-angiography, CT-angiography or ultrasound may be used for long-term monitoring of structural damage, particularly at sites of preceding vascular inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The 2023 EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance for the role of imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with LVV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Whiting, P. F., Rutjes, A. W. S., Westwood, M. E., Mallett, S., Deeks, J. J., Reitsma, J. B., Leeflang, M. M. G., Sterne, J. A. C., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & the QUADAS-2 Group* (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 · Cited by 14,199
Evaluation of the Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews
Hayden, J. A., Côté, P., & Bombardier, C. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010 · Cited by 1,452
Trial of tocilizumab in giant-cell arteritis
Stone, J. H., Tuckwell, K., Dimonaco, S., Klearman, M., Aringer, M., Blockmans, D., Brouwer, E., Cid, M. C., Dasgupta, B., Rech, J., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1613849 · Cited by 1,386
Self-citation2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis
Hellmich, B., Agueda, A., Monti, S., Buttgereit, F., de Boysson, H., Brouwer, E., Cassie, R., Cid, M. C., Dasgupta, B., Dejaco, C., et al. (2020) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672 · Cited by 1,200
Self-citationEULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice
Dejaco, C., Ramiro, S., Duftner, C., Besson, F. L., Bley, T. A., Blockmans, D., Brouwer, E., Cimmino, M. A., Clark, E., Dasgupta, B., et al. (2018) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212649 · Cited by 963
Self-citationAngiographic findings of Takayasu arteritis: New classification
Hata, A., Noda, M., Moriwaki, R., & Numano, F. (1996) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-5273(96)02813-6 · Cited by 669
Blockmans, D., Ceuninck, L. D., Vanderschueren, S., Knockaert, D., Mortelmans, L., & Bobbaers, H. (2006) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.21699 · Cited by 628
Self-citationSelection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures
Griner, P. F., Mayewski, R. J., Mushlin, A. I., & Greenland, P. (1981) · Annals of Internal Medicine · Cited by 595
Luqmani, R., Lee, E., Singh, S., Gillett, M., Schmidt, W. A., Bradburn, M., Dasgupta, B., Diamantopoulos, A. P., Forrester-Barker, W., Hamilton, W., et al. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20900 · Cited by 462
Self-citationGrayson, P. C., Alehashemi, S., Bagheri, A. A., Civelek, A. C., Cupps, T. R., Kaplan, M. J., Malayeri, A. A., Merkel, P. A., Novakovich, E., Bluemke, D. A., et al. (2018) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.40379 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Dejaco, C., Ramiro, S., Bond, M., Bosch, P., Ponte, C., Mackie, S. L., Bley, T. A., Blockmans, D., Brolin, S., Bolek, E. C., Cassie, R., Cid, M. C., Molina-Collada, J., Dasgupta, B., Nielsen, B. D., De Miguel, E., Direskeneli, H., Duftner, C., Hočevar, A., Molto, A., Schäfer, V. S., Seitz, L., Slart, R. H. J. A., & Schmidt, W. A.
- Venue
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 741-751
- ISSN
- 0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385625271
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 61.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice: 2023 update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/ard-2023-224543
- The paper
- Dejaco, C., Ramiro, S., Bond, M., Bosch, P., Ponte, C., Mackie, S. L., Bley, T. A., Blockmans, D., Brolin, S., Bolek, E. C., Cassie, R., Cid, M. C., Molina-Collada, J., Dasgupta, B., Nielsen, B. D., De Miguel, E., Direskeneli, H., Duftner, C., Hočevar, A., . . . Schmidt, W. A. (2024). EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice: 2023 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-224543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
