The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education
Abstract
The use of online social networks in medical education can remodel and enhance anatomy teaching and learning; one such network is the video-sharing site YouTube. Limited research in the literature exists on the use of YouTube as a platform for anatomy education. The aim of this study is to assess student's perceptions and patterns of usage of this resource, as well as the effectiveness of YouTube videos within a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. The study was conducted on 91 second-year medical students for whom video links were suggested throughout the academic year. In addition, the Human Anatomy Education (HAE) Channel was launched on YouTube to support classroom teaching with videos that emphasized applied aspects of anatomy. The results demonstrated that 98% of the students used YouTube as an online information resource, albeit in different frequencies. Out of the 86% who have been to the HAE Channel, 92% agreed/strongly agreed that the channel helped them learn anatomy. The study also reports the popularity of and awareness about using YouTube as a social network as well as in learning. Based on these findings, YouTube can be considered as an effective tool to enhance anatomy instruction if the videos are scrutinized, diversified, and aimed toward course objectives. Faculty of average computer literacy should be enabled to produce videos on their own YouTube channels to support independent learning and integration in a PBL curriculum. The methods described for ca…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The use of video streaming media, such as YouTube (http://www.youtube.com), in the classroom learning is important to be considered as an alternative educational tool to promote students' engagements in science lessons (Jaffar, 2012).”
From Teaching and Learning Science Using YouTube Videos and Discovery Learning in Primary School (2020) · cites this paper as Jaffar, 2012
Citations
Cites
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently?
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424843 · Cited by 4,035
Oblinger, D. G., Oblinger, J. L., & Lippincott, J. K. (2005) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 2,290
The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education
Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002 · Cited by 2,240
Boulos, M. N. K., Maramba, I. D. C., & Wheeler, S. (2006) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-6-41 · Cited by 1,154
Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow
Drake, R. L., McBride, J. M., Lachman, N., & Pawlina, W. (2009) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.117 · Cited by 818
YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content Analysis
Keelan, J. E., Pavri-Garcia, V., TOMLINSON, G. A., & Wilson, K. R. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.21.2482 · Cited by 593
YouTube As a Source of Information on the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic
Pandey, A., Patni, N., Singh, M., Sood, A., & Singh, G. (2010) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.007 · Cited by 367
YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information
Steinberg, P. L., Wason, S. E. L., Stern, J. M., Deters, L. A., Kowal, B. F., & Seigne, J. D. (2009) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059 · Cited by 271
Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning?
Clifton, A., & Mann, C. (2010) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.004 · Cited by 259
YouTube as a Source of Information on Kidney Stone Disease
Sood, A., Sarangi, S., Pandey, A., & Murugiah, K. (2010) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.536 · Cited by 226
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Berk RA, 2009, Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtvU in the college classroom, Int J Tech Teach Learn, 5, 1
- GodwinP.2007. The Web 2.0 challenge to information literacy. In: Proceedings of 13th Conference on Professional Information Resources (INFORUM 2007); Prague Czech Republic; 2007 May 22‐24. Albertina icome Praha s.r.o. Prague Czech Republic. URL:http://inforum.sk/pdf/2007/godwin‐peter.pdf[accessed 25 August 2011].
- Lovell K, 2009, Student utilization of digital versions of classroom lectures, J Int Assoc Med Sci Educ, 19, 20
Cited by
Sorted by citations
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565
Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century
Ghosh, S. K. (2016) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1649 · Cited by 560
Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube
Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A. B., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2017) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001 · Cited by 439
Franchi, T. (2020) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1966 · Cited by 392
Iwanaga, J., Loukas, M., Dumont, A. S., & Tubbs, R. S. (2020) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.23655 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaffar, A. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Sharjah (AE)
- Corresponding author
- Jaffar, Akram Abood
- ORCID
- Jaffar, Akram Abood
- Venue
- Anatomical Sciences Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 158-164
- ISSN
- 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-9780
- OpenAlex
- W1990577453
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anatomical Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Sharjah
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- YouTube, anatomy education, online video platforms, social networking sites, problem-based learning, medical students, student perceptions, self-directed learning, clinical anatomy
- MeSH terms
- Anatomy, Attitude to Computers, Audiovisual Aids, Awareness, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Perception, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, United Arab Emirates, Video Recording, Program Evaluation, Problem-Based Learning, Internet, Social Networking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review