Cited by 4,035Generational Differences and TrendsDigital Media and PhilosophyLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences

Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently?

Prensky, Marc·2001·On the Horizon

Abstract

Part 2 of Prensky’s paper exploring the differences between “digital natives” and “digital immigrants”. In this second part the author presents evidence to support these differences from neurology, social psychology and from studies done on children using games for learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/10748120110424843

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prensky, M.
Corresponding author
Prensky, Marc
Venue
On the Horizon
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2001-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1074-8121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114216000
Cited by
4,035
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 156 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 230 · 2023: 225 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 275 · 2020: 212 · 2019: 223 · 2018: 276 · 2017: 241 · 2016: 284 · 2015: 264 · 2014: 218 · 2013: 252 · 2012: 195
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Keywords
digital natives, digital immigrants, generational differences, cognitive differences, neurology, social psychology, game-based learning, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review