Improvement in student performance and perceptions through a flipped anatomy classroom: shifting from passive traditional to active blended learning
Abstract
One of the major challenges facing anatomy educators is delivering the anatomy materials in fewer hours with a reduction of anatomy courses in the integrated curricula. The flipped classroom modality may be an innovative solution. However, its effectiveness remains under debate due to a lack of outcome-based research and the mixed results of students' performance. The present study aimed to determine the outcome of the flipped classroom based upon the level of student cognition. The study investigated performance on 17 multiple-choice anatomy questions as a part of the final examination of the musculoskeletal system module. The results were compared between the first-year female students of Qassim Medical College, specifically the flipped classroom group (46 students) of the academic year (2018-2019) and the traditional group (49 students) of the academic year (2017-2018). The mean differences in the students' grades on the anatomy questions at the level of knowledge, application, and analysis using Cohen's d test were 0.43, 1.41, and 1.01, respectively. These results suggest the positive impact of flipping the students' classrooms on improving their levels of thinking according to Bloom's taxonomy. Perception surveys also revealed students' enthusiasm for the pre-class activities, leading to a better performance in the class with more engagement with their peers and teachers. The present study suggested that the flipped classroom modality can be performed to compensate for t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The traditional lecture-based learning model, due to its singular methodology, lack of interactivity, and limited practicality, fails to fully engage students' initiative and restricts their comprehensive development, often resulting in suboptimal teaching quality, academic performance, and student evaluations.
“Due to its singular methodology, lack of interactivity, and limited practicality, this model fails to fully engage students’ initiative and restricts their comprehensive development, often resulting in suboptimal teaching quality, academic performance, and student evaluations (9).”
From The effectiveness of an integrated CBL and BOPPPS model in neurological nursing clinical teaching: a comparative study (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education
Taber, K. S. (2018) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 · Cited by 10,679 · see citing works
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 · Cited by 2,152 · see citing works
McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12509 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fischer, K., Sullivan, A. M., Cohen, A. P., King, R. W., Cockrill, B. A., & Besche, H. C. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04325-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Qian, P., Su, J., & Xu, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1789025
- Authors
- El Sadik, A., & Al Abdulmonem, W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Anatomy and Histology College of Medicine Qassim University Qassim Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pathology College of Medicine Qassim University Qassim Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- ORCID
- El Sadik, Abir
- Venue
- Anatomical Sciences Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-09-28
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 482-490
- ISSN
- 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-9780
- OpenAlex
- W3082760810
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 19.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anatomical Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- flipped classroom, anatomy education, musculoskeletal system, student performance, Bloom's taxonomy, student perceptions, blended learning, active learning, medical students
- MeSH terms
- Anatomy, Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Perception, Students, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review