Cited by 106Innovative Teaching MethodsAnatomy and Medical TechnologyInnovations in Medical Education

Improvement in student performance and perceptions through a flipped anatomy classroom: shifting from passive traditional to active blended learning

El Sadik, Abir, Al Abdulmonem, Waleed·2021·Anatomical Sciences Education

Abstract

One of the major challenges facing anatomy educators is delivering the anatomy materials in fewer hours with a reduction of anatomy courses in the integrated curricula. The flipped classroom modality may be an innovative solution. However, its effectiveness remains under debate due to a lack of outcome-based research and the mixed results of students' performance. The present study aimed to determine the outcome of the flipped classroom based upon the level of student cognition. The study investigated performance on 17 multiple-choice anatomy questions as a part of the final examination of the musculoskeletal system module. The results were compared between the first-year female students of Qassim Medical College, specifically the flipped classroom group (46 students) of the academic year (2018-2019) and the traditional group (49 students) of the academic year (2017-2018). The mean differences in the students' grades on the anatomy questions at the level of knowledge, application, and analysis using Cohen's d test were 0.43, 1.41, and 1.01, respectively. These results suggest the positive impact of flipping the students' classrooms on improving their levels of thinking according to Bloom's taxonomy. Perception surveys also revealed students' enthusiasm for the pre-class activities, leading to a better performance in the class with more engagement with their peers and teachers. The present study suggested that the flipped classroom modality can be performed to compensate for t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ase.2015

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The traditional lecture-based learning model, due to its singular methodology, lack of interactivity, and limited practicality, fails to fully engage students' initiative and restricts their comprehensive development, often resulting in suboptimal teaching quality, academic performance, and student evaluations.

    “Due to its singular methodology, lack of interactivity, and limited practicality, this model fails to fully engage students’ initiative and restricts their comprehensive development, often resulting in suboptimal teaching quality, academic performance, and student evaluations (9).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Sadik, A., & Al Abdulmonem, W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anatomy and Histology College of Medicine Qassim University Qassim Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Department of Pathology College of Medicine Qassim University Qassim Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Venue
Anatomical Sciences Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-28
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
482-490
ISSN
  • 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-9780
OpenAlex
W3082760810
Cited by
106
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 7
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anatomical Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
flipped classroom, anatomy education, musculoskeletal system, student performance, Bloom's taxonomy, student perceptions, blended learning, active learning, medical students
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Perception, Students, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review