Cited by 28Innovative Teaching MethodsInnovations in Medical EducationVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Using cognitive load theory to evaluate and improve preparatory materials and study time for the flipped classroom

Open access
Fischer, Krisztina, Sullivan, Amy M., Cohen, Amy P., King, Randall W., Cockrill, Barbara A., Besche, Henrike C.·2023·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

Background: Preclinical medical education is content-dense and time-constrained. Flipped classroom approaches promote durable learning, but challenges with unsatisfactory student preparation and high workload remain. Cognitive load theory defines instructional design as “efficient” if learners can master the presented concepts without cognitive overload. We created a PReparatory Evaluation Process (PREP) to systematically assess and measure improvement in the cognitive-load efficiency of preparatory materials and impact on study time (time-efficiency). Methods: We conducted this study in a flipped, multidisciplinary course for ~ 170 first year students at Harvard Medical School using a naturalistic post-test design. For each flipped session (n = 97), we assessed cognitive load and preparatory study time by administering a 3-item PREP survey embedded within a short subject-matter quiz students completed before class. Over three years (2017–2019), we evaluated cognitive load- and time- based efficiency to guide iterative revisions of the materials by content experts. The ability of PREP to detect changes to the instructional design (sensitivity) was validated through a manual audit of the materials. Results: The average survey response rate was ≥ 94%. Content expertise was not required to interpret PREP data. Initially students did not necessarily allocate the most study time to the most difficult content. Over time, the iterative changes in instructional design increased the cognitive load- and time-based efficiency of preparatory materials with large effect sizes ( p < .01). Furthermore, this increased the overall alignment of cognitive load with study time: students allocated more time to difficult content away from more familiar, less difficult content without increasing workload overall. Conclusions: Cognitive load and time constraints are important parameters to consider when designing curricula. The PREP process is learner-centered, grounded in educational theory, and works independently of content knowledge. It can provide rich and actionable insights into instructional design of flipped classes not captured by traditional satisfaction-based evaluations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-023-04325-x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Computation of effect sizes. Retrieved from http://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. Psychoterica. 2016; 10.13140/RG.2.17823.92329. · DOI

Authors
Fischer, K., Sullivan, A. M., Cohen, A. P., King, R. W., Cockrill, B. A., & Besche, H. C.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Besche, Henrike C.
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2023-05-17
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
345-345
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4377011360
Cited by
28
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3
FWCI
20.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
cognitive load theory, flipped classroom, study time, instructional design, preclinical education, curriculum evaluation, student workload, student-centered assessment
MeSH terms
Cognition, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Humans, Learning, Surveys and Questionnaires, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review